HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

Often a partial differential equation can be reduced to a simpler form with a known solution by a suitable
change of variables Change or Changing may refer to: Alteration * Impermanence, a difference in a state of affairs at different points in time * Menopause, also referred to as "the change", the permanent cessation of the menstrual period * Metamorphosis, or change, ...
. The article discusses change of variable for PDEs below in two ways: #by example; #by giving the theory of the method.


Explanation by example

For example, the following simplified form of the Black–Scholes PDE : \frac + \frac S^2\frac + S\frac - V = 0. is reducible to the heat equation : \frac = \frac by the change of variables: : V(S,t) = v(x(S),\tau(t)) : x(S) = \ln(S) : \tau(t) = \frac (T - t) : v(x,\tau)=\exp(-(1/2)x-(9/4)\tau) u(x,\tau) in these steps: * Replace V(S,t) by v(x(S),\tau(t)) and apply the
chain rule In calculus, the chain rule is a formula that expresses the derivative of the composition of two differentiable functions and in terms of the derivatives of and . More precisely, if h=f\circ g is the function such that h(x)=f(g(x)) for every , ...
to get ::\frac\left(-2v(x(S),\tau)+2 \frac \frac +S\left(\left(2 \frac + S\frac\right) \frac + S \left(\frac\right)^2 \frac\right)\right)=0. * Replace x(S) and \tau(t) by \ln(S) and \frac(T-t) to get ::\frac\left( -2v(\ln(S),\frac(T-t)) -\frac +\frac +\frac\right)=0. * Replace \ln(S) and \frac(T-t) by x(S) and \tau(t) and divide both sides by \frac to get ::-2 v-\frac+\frac+ \frac=0. * Replace v(x,\tau) by \exp(-(1/2)x-(9/4)\tau) u(x,\tau) and divide through by -\exp(-(1/2)x-(9/4)\tau) to yield the heat equation. Advice on the application of change of variable to PDEs is given by mathematician J. Michael Steele:


Technique in general

Suppose that we have a function u(x,t) and a change of variables x_1,x_2 such that there exist functions a(x,t), b(x,t) such that :x_1=a(x,t) :x_2=b(x,t) and functions e(x_1,x_2),f(x_1,x_2) such that :x=e(x_1,x_2) :t=f(x_1,x_2) and furthermore such that :x_1=a(e(x_1,x_2),f(x_1,x_2)) :x_2=b(e(x_1,x_2),f(x_1,x_2)) and :x=e(a(x,t),b(x,t)) :t=f(a(x,t),b(x,t)) In other words, it is helpful for there to be a bijection between the old set of variables and the new one, or else one has to * Restrict the domain of applicability of the correspondence to a subject of the real plane which is sufficient for a solution of the practical problem at hand (where again it needs to be a bijection), and * Enumerate the (zero or more finite list) of exceptions (poles) where the otherwise-bijection fails (and say why these exceptions don't restrict the applicability of the solution of the reduced equation to the original equation) If a bijection does not exist then the solution to the reduced-form equation will not in general be a solution of the original equation. We are discussing change of variable for PDEs. A PDE can be expressed as a differential operator applied to a function. Suppose \mathcal is a differential operator such that :\mathcalu(x,t)=0 Then it is also the case that :\mathcalv(x_1,x_2)=0 where :v(x_1,x_2)=u(e(x_1,x_2),f(x_1,x_2)) and we operate as follows to go from \mathcalu(x,t)=0 to \mathcalv(x_1,x_2)=0: * Apply the
chain rule In calculus, the chain rule is a formula that expresses the derivative of the composition of two differentiable functions and in terms of the derivatives of and . More precisely, if h=f\circ g is the function such that h(x)=f(g(x)) for every , ...
to \mathcal v(x_1(x,t),x_2(x,t))=0 and expand out giving equation e_1. * Substitute a(x,t) for x_1(x,t) and b(x,t) for x_2(x,t) in e_1 and expand out giving equation e_2. * Replace occurrences of x by e(x_1,x_2) and t by f(x_1,x_2) to yield \mathcalv(x_1,x_2)=0, which will be free of x and t. In the context of PDEs, Weizhang Huang and Robert D. Russell define and explain the different possible time-dependent transformations in details.


Action-angle coordinates

Often, theory can establish the existence of a change of variables, although the formula itself cannot be explicitly stated. For an integrable Hamiltonian system of dimension n , with \dot_i = \partial H/\partial p_j and \dot_j = - \partial H/\partial x_j , there exist n integrals I_i . There exists a change of variables from the coordinates \ to a set of variables \ , in which the equations of motion become \dot_i = 0 , \dot_i = \omega_i(I_1, \dots, I_n) , where the functions \omega_1, \dots, \omega_n are unknown, but depend only on I_1, \dots, I_n . The variables I_1, \dots, I_n are the action coordinates, the variables \varphi_1, \dots, \varphi_n are the angle coordinates. The motion of the system can thus be visualized as rotation on torii. As a particular example, consider the simple harmonic oscillator, with \dot = 2p and \dot = - 2x , with Hamiltonian H(x,p) = x^2 + p^2 . This system can be rewritten as \dot = 0 , \dot{\varphi} = 1 , where I and \varphi are the canonical polar coordinates: I = p^2 + q^2 and \tan(\varphi) = p/x . See V. I. Arnold, `Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics', for more details. V. I. Arnold, ''Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics'', Graduate Texts in Mathematics, v. 60, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989


References

Multivariable calculus *