Campbell V. General Dynamics Government Systems Corp.
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In ''Campbell v. General Dynamics Gov't Sys. Corp.'',
407 __NOTOC__ Year 407 ( CDVII) was a common year starting on Tuesday (link will display the full calendar) of the Julian calendar. At the time, it was known as the Year of the Consulship of Honorius and Theodosius(or, less frequently, year 1160 ' ...
F.3d The ''Federal Reporter'' () is a case law reporter in the United States that is published by West Publishing and a part of the National Reporter System. It begins with cases decided in 1880; pre-1880 cases were later retroactively compiled by We ...
546 (1st Cir. 2005), the First Circuit had to consider the enforceability of a mandatory arbitration agreement, contained in a dispute resolution policy linked to an e-mailed company-wide announcement, insofar as it applies to employment discrimination claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Under the Court's analysis, the question turned on whether the employer provided minimally sufficient notice of the contractual nature of the e-mailed policy and of the concomitant waiver of an employee's right to access a judicial forum. The Court weighed the attendant circumstances; concluded that the notice was wanting and that, therefore, enforcement of the waiver would be inappropriate; and upheld the district court's
denial Denial, in ordinary English usage, has at least three meanings: asserting that any particular statement or allegation is not true (which might be accurate or inaccurate); the refusal of a request; and asserting that a true statement is not true. ...
of the employer's motion to stay proceedings and compel the employee to submit his claim to arbitration. The case is a
principal case The term principal case refers to a legal case that is deemed basic to understanding a legal principle. As a result, it may also refer to the case in a casebook A casebook is a type of textbook used primarily by students in law schools.Wayne L. ...
in the Rothstein, Liebman employment law casebook.Sixth edition Foundation Press Page 59


Background

An employee filed an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claim, alleging that the employer terminated him because of sleep apnea. Previously, the company had announced a new dispute resolution policy that required discrimination claims to be submitted to arbitration. It announced the policy in a company-wide email; the text was accessed by links in the e-mail. The
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (in case citations, D. Mass.) is the federal district court whose territorial jurisdiction is the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, United States. The first court session was he ...
struck the defendant's affirmative defense and denied its motion to stay proceedings and to compel plaintiff employee to submit to arbitration his claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.S. §§ 12101-12213.


Opinion of the court

The First Circuit affirmed the decision of the lower court. The court had no jurisdiction to review an interlocutory order granting the employee's motion to strike the affirmative defense under the
Federal Arbitration Act The United States Arbitration Act (, codified at ), more commonly referred to as the Federal Arbitration Act or FAA, is an act of Congress that provides for judicial facilitation of private dispute resolution through arbitration. It applies in ...
, 9 U.S.C.S. §§ 1-16. The court affirmed the denial of the employer's motion to stay and to compel arbitration. Enforcement of the arbitration policy was not appropriate because the e-mail did not provide minimally sufficient notice to a reasonably prudent employee of the contractual nature of the e-mailed policy and the concomitant waiver of the employee's right to access a judicial forum. The court held that the mass e-mail, which did not require an affirmative response but requested the recipient to review the materials, was not a traditional means for conveying contractually binding terms of employment and did not state directly that the policy contained a mandatory arbitration agreement that would become the employee's exclusive remedy for all claims.


References


Further reading


RECENT DEVELOPMENT: Campbell v. Gen. Dynamics Gov't Sys. Corp. 21 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 1073


External links

* {{General Dynamics United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit cases United States arbitration case law United States disability case law 2005 in United States case law General Dynamics