History
showed that the Busemann–Petty problem has a negative solution in dimensions at least 12, and this bound was reduced to dimensions at least 5 by several other authors. pointed out a particularly simple counterexample: all sections of the unit volume cube have measure at most , while in dimensions at least 10 all central sections of the unit volume ball have measure at least . introduced intersection bodies, and showed that the Busemann–Petty problem has a positive solution in a given dimension if and only if every symmetric convex body is an intersection body. An intersection body is a star body whose radial function in a given direction ''u'' is the volume of the hyperplane section ''u''⊥ ∩ ''K'' for some fixed star body ''K''. used Lutwak's result to show that the Busemann–Petty problem has a positive solution if the dimension is 3. claimed incorrectly that the unit cube in R4 is not an intersection body, which would have implied that the Busemann–Petty problem has a negative solution if the dimension is at least 4. However showed that a centrally symmetric star-shaped body is an intersection body if and only if the function 1/, , ''x'', , is a positive definite distribution, where , , x, , is the homogeneous function of degree 1 that is 1 on the boundary of the body, and used this to show that the unit balls l, 1 < ''p'' ≤ ∞ in ''n''-dimensional space with the l''p'' norm are intersection bodies for ''n'' = 4 but are not intersection bodies for ''n'' ≥ 5, showing that Zhang's result was incorrect. then showed that the Busemann–Petty problem has a positive solution in dimension 4. gave a uniform solution for all dimensions.See also
* Shephard's problemReferences
* * * * * * * * * * * {{DEFAULTSORT:Busemann-Petty problem Convex geometry