Brut Dingestow

''Brut y Brenhinedd'' ("Chronicle of the Kings") is a collection of variant Middle Welsh versions of Geoffrey of Monmouth's Latin ''Historia Regum Britanniae''. About 60 versions survive, with the earliest dating to the mid-13th century. Adaptations of Geoffrey's ''Historia'' were extremely popular throughout Western Europe during the Middle Ages, but the ''Brut'' proved especially influential in medieval Wales, where it was largely regarded as an accurate account of the early history of the Celtic Britons.

Geoffrey's ''Historia'' and the ''Brut y Brenhinedd''

Geoffrey's ''Historia Regum Britanniae'' (completed by ) purports to narrate the history of the Kings of Britain from its eponymous founder Brutus of Troy to Cadwaladr, the last in the line. Geoffrey professed to have based his history on "a certain very ancient book" written in ''britannicus sermo'' (the "British tongue", i.e. Common Brittonic, Welsh, Cornish or Breton) which he had received from Walter of Oxford. It became one of the most popular works in the medieval West, but its impact was particularly profound and enduring in Wales, where the ''Historia'' was accepted as a largely authentic and authoritative account.Roberts, "''Brut y Brenhinedd''". The influence is most clearly evidenced by the existence of several translations into Welsh from the 13th century onwards, usually known as ''Brut y Brenhinedd''. The manuscript history of these texts is a rich and long one attesting to the production of several translations and new redactions, most of which were copied many times over.

The Welsh renderings are not straightforward translations in the modern sense, but by contemporary standards, they are generally close to their Latin source text, with only some commentary or additional material from bardic traditional lore (''cyfarwydd'') appended to the text. Importantly, several manuscripts include a version of the tale known as ''Lludd and Llefelys'' inserted in the segment about Lludd Llaw Eraint; the presence or absence of this tale has been used to classify the early versions of the ''Brut''.Bromwich, ''Triads''. p. 416. One notable area in which Welsh translators have corrected or adapted Geoffrey based on native traditions is that of personal names and soubriquets. For Geoffrey's "Heli", for instance, was substituted Beli Mawr, an ancestor figure who also appears in '' Branwen ferch Llŷr'' and elsewhere in Middle Welsh literature.

Versions

There are about sixty attestations of the Welsh ''Brut'' in the manuscripts. Brynley F. Roberts, citing J.J. Parry and his own examination of the texts, places all the existing versions into six variant classes: 1) Dingestow MS., 2) Peniarth 44, 3) Llanstephan 1, 4) Peniarth 21, 5) Cotton Cleopatra B. v, and 6) the ''Brut Tysilio''.

13th century

*1. The ''Brut'' in NLW, Llanstephan MS 1 (mid-13th century), is a relatively close translation of Geoffrey's ''Historia''.
*2. The ''Brut'' in NLW, Peniarth MS 44 (mid-13th century). This text becomes increasingly more condensed towards the end, omitting Merlin's prophecy in the process on stated grounds that it lacks credibility. Yet it has the distinct quality of being the first ''Brut'' to incorporate the tale ''Lludd and Llefelys''.
*3. ''Brut Dingestow'' (later in the 13th century), now in MS Aberystwyth, NLW 5266, once appears to have been in MS 6 of the Dingestow court collection, and may have originated in Gwynedd. Again, the text is a relatively faithful translation, aided by its occasional reliance on Llanstephan MS 1.

Of these three texts, it is Llanstephan MS 1 and ''Brut Dingestow'' which then came to provide the textual basis for many of the copies attested in other MSS from the 13th century onwards, such as Mostyn MS 117 and NLW Peniarth MS 16.

14th century

* Red Book of Hergest redaction. A revised version, presumably from south Wales, was produced which follows the Dingestow version up to the end of Merlin's prophecy, and continues with the Llanstephan 1 version. Copied in numerous MSS, this conflated version is most famously represented by the text in the ''Llyfr Coch Hergest'' or Red Book of Hergest. In most every manuscript, it is preceded by the ''Ystorya Dared'', i.e. a Welsh translation of the ''De Excidio Troiae'' ascribed to Dares Phrygius, and followed by the '' Brut y Tywysogion''. In this way, the text is made the central piece in a world history extending from the Trojan War up to events close to the redactors' own time. It seems that the ''Ystorya Dared'', which has no independent existence in the manuscripts, was specially composed to serve as its prologue.
*4. The ''Brut'' in NLW Peniarth MS 23 and elsewhere, a fresh and fairly close translation of Geoffrey's ''Historia''.
*5. The ''Brut'' in BL Cotton Cleopatra B. v, NLW MS 7006 (Black Book of Basingwerk) and elsewhere, appears to have circulated in north-east Wales. It represents a freer and more piquant version than was previously attempted and draws on some extraneous material, notably Wace's '' Roman de Brut'' (a Norman language work which was in turn based on Geoffrey's ''Historia'') and a Latin chronology. In the manuscripts, it is sandwiched between the ''Ystorya Dared'' and the '' Brenhinoedd y Saeson'' (''Kings of the English''), a version of the ''Brut y Tywysogyon'' which incorporates material from English chronicles. Also included is a condensed version of the ''Lludd and Llefelys'' tale. This ''Brut'' is the version used for the Welsh historical compilation attributed to the late 15th-century poet Gutun Owain, as well as for the ''Brut Tysilio''.

14th or 15th century

*6. ''Brut Tysilio''. Oxford, Jesus College MS 28, transcript from Jesus College MS 61 (14th or 15th century) made by Hugh Jones in 1695.

''Brut Tysilio'' and Geoffrey's putative British source

The version known as the ''Brut Tysilio'', attributed to the 7th-century Welsh saint Tysilio, became more widely known when its text was published in ''The Myvyrian Archaiology of Wales'', a once-influential collection of Welsh literary material whose credibility has suffered due to the involvement of the antiquarian forger Iolo Morganwg, in 1801–1807. The editors did not place much faith in the attribution to Tysilio, using that title merely to distinguish it from another Welsh ''Brut'' entitled ''Brut Gruffudd ap Arthur'' (the chronicle of Geoffrey son of Arthur, an alternative name for Geoffrey of Monmouth). An English translation of the ''Brut Tysilio'' by Peter Roberts was published in 1811, and San Marte made a German translation of Roberts' English translation in 1854, making it available to non-specialists.

At the very end of the ''Brut Tysilio'' there appears a colophon ascribed to Walter, Archdeacon of Oxford, saying "I ��translated this book from the Welsh into Latin, and in my old age have again translated it from the Latin into Welsh." On this basis, some took the ''Brut Tysilio'' to be, at one or more remove, the "very ancient book" that Geoffrey claimed to have translated from the "British tongue".Gerald Morgan, "Welsh Arthurian Literature", in Norris J. Lacy (ed.), ''A history of Arthurian scholarship'', Boydell & Brewer, 2006, pp. 77-94 This claim was taken up by the archaeologist Flinders Petrie, who argued in a paper presented to the Royal Society in 1917 that the ''Brut'' and the ''Historia Regum Britanniae'' were both derived from a hypothetical 10th-century version in Breton and ultimately from material originating in Roman times, and called for further study. Flinders Petrie, "Neglected British History", ''Proceedings of the British Academy'', Volume VIII, pp. 251-278.

However, modern scholarship has established that all surviving Welsh variants are derivative of Geoffrey rather than the other way around.Roberts, ''Brut y Brenhinedd'', Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, 1971, pp. xxiv-xxxi Roberts has shown the ''Brut Tysilio'' to be "an amalgam of versions", the earlier part deriving from Peniarth 44, and the later part abridged from Cotton Cleopatra. It survives in manuscripts dating from , and Roberts argues that a "textual study of the version ��shows that this is a late compilation, not different in essentials from other chronicles which were being composed in the fifteenth century".

References

Secondary sources

*Evans, D. Simon. ''A Grammar of Middle Welsh''. Dublin, 1964.
*Koch, John T. "A Welsh Window on the Iron Age: Manawydan, Mandubracios." ''Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies'' 14 (1987): 17–52.
*Koch, John T. "The Celtic Lands." In ''Medieval Arthurian Literature: A Guide to Recent Research'', ed. N. Lacy. New York, 1996. 239–322.
*Petrie, Flinders. "Neglected British History." ''Proceedings of the British Academy'' 8 (1917–18): 251–78.
*Roberts, Brynley F. “''Brut y Brenhinedd''.” In ''Celtic Culture. A Historical Encyclopedia'', ed. John T. Koch. 5 vols. Santa Barbara et al., 2006. pp. 298–9.
*Roberts, Brynley F. ''Brut y Brenhinedd'', cited below.

Primary sources

*''Brut y Brenhinedd'' (Llanstephan MS 1), ed. Brynley F. Roberts, ''Brut y Brenhinedd. Llanstephan MS. 1 version. Selections''. Mediaeval and Modern Welsh series 5. Dublin, 1971. Extracts and discussion.
*''Brut Dingestow'', ed. Henry Lewis, ''Brut Dingestow''. Cardiff: Gwasg Pryfisgol Cymru, 1942. In Welsh.
*''Brut Tysilio'', ed. Owen Jones et al., ''The Myvyrian archaiology of Wales''. Vol. 1. London, 1801; tr. R.E. Jones, in ''The Historia regum Britanniæ of Geoffrey of Monmouth'', ed. A. Griscom an J.R. Ellis. London, 1929; tr. Peter Roberts, ''The chronicle of the kings of Britain. Translated from the Welsh copy attributed to Tysilio''. London, 1811; updated translation in Petrie's "Neglected British History" cited above; tr. A.S. San Marte, ''Brut Tysilio. Gottfrieds von Monmouth Historia Regum Britanniae und Brut Tysilio''. Halle, 1854 (German translation).
*''Brut y Brenhinedd'' (Cotton Cleopatra B. v and Black Book of Basingwerk), ed. and tr. John Jay Parry, ''Brut y Brenhinedd (Cotton Cleopatra Version)''. Cambridge (Mass.), 1937. Criticised by W.J. Gruffydd, especially for errors in the translation, ''Medium Aevum'' 9 (1940): 44–9.
*Red Book of Hergest 'edition' of ''Brut y Brenhinedd'', ed. John Rhys and J.G. Evans, ''The Text of the Bruts from the Red Book of Hergest''. Oxford, 1890. Diplomatic edition.

Further reading

*Bromwich, Rachel (2006). ''Trioedd Ynys Prydein: The Triads of the Island of Britain''. University Of Wales Press. .
*Griscom, A. and J.R. Ellis (eds.). ''The Historia regum Britanniæ of Geoffrey of Monmouth with contributions to the study of its place in early British history''. London, 1929.
*Jarman, A.O.H. "Lewis Morris a ''Brut Tysilio''." ''Llên Cymru'' 2:3 (1953): 161–83.
*Roberts, Brynley F. “Geoffrey of Monmouth, ''Histora Regum Britanniae'' and ''Brut y Brenhinedd''.” In ''The Arthur of the Welsh. The Arthurian Legend in Medieval Welsh Literature'', ed. A.O.H. Jarman, Rachel Bromwich and Brynley F. Roberts. Cardiff, 1991. 97-116.
*Roberts, Brynley F. ''Brut Tysilio. Darlith agoriadol gan Athro y Gymraeg a'i Llenyddiaeth''. Swansea, 1980.
*Roberts, Brynley F. "The Red Book of Hergest version of ''Brut y Brenhinedd''." ''Studia Celtica'' 12/13 (1977-8): 147–86.
*Roberts, Brynley F. "Fersiwn Dingestow o ''Brut y Brenhinedd''." ''Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies'' 27 (1977): 331–61.
*Roberts, Brynley F. "The Treatment of Personal Names in the Early Welsh Versions of the ''Historia Regum Britanniae''." ''Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies'' 25 (1973): 274–90.
*Reiss, E. “The Welsh versions of Geoffrey of Monmouth's ''Historia''.” '' Welsh History Review'' 4 (1968/9): 97-127.

External links

''Brut Tysilio'', Oxford, Jesus College MS 28A collection of historical prose in Middle Welsh (includes multiple versions of ''Brut y Brenhinedd'')''The Chronicle of the Kings of Britain''
1811 translation of the ''Brut Tysilio'' by Peter Roberts

{{DEFAULTSORT:Brut Y Brenhinedd
15th-century history books
Arthurian literature in Welsh
British traditional history
Medieval Welsh literature
Translations of Geoffrey of Monmouth
Welsh chronicles