Statement
Suppose that ''f'' is a function of ''n'' − 1 real variables. The graph of ''f'' is a surface in R''n'', and the condition that this is a minimal surface is that ''f'' satisfies the minimal surface equation : Bernstein's problem asks whether an ''entire'' function (a function defined throughout R''n''−1 ) that solves this equation is necessarily a degree-1 polynomial.History
proved Bernstein's theorem that a graph of a real function on R2 that is also a minimal surface in R3 must be a plane. gave a new proof of Bernstein's theorem by deducing it from the fact that there is no non-planar area-minimizing cone in R3. showed that if there is no non-planar area-minimizing cone in R''n''−1 then the analogue of Bernstein's theorem is true in R''n'', which in particular implies that it is true in R4. showed there are no non-planar minimizing cones in R4, thus extending Bernstein's theorem to R5. showed there are no non-planar minimizing cones in R7, thus extending Bernstein's theorem to R8. He also gave examples of locally stable cones in R8 and asked if they were globally area-minimizing. showed that Simons' cones are indeed globally minimizing, and showed that in R''n'' for ''n''≥9 there are graphs that are minimal but not hyperplanes. Combined with the result of Simons, this shows that the analogue of Bernstein's theorem is true in dimensions up to 8, and false in higher dimensions. A specific example is the surface .References
* * German translation in * * * * * *{{eom, id=b/b110360, title=Bernstein problem in differential geometry, first=E. , last=StraumeExternal links