Background
The alleged conspiracy involved the formation of the National Football League Properties (NFLP), an entity responsible for licensing NFL intellectual property and formed in 1963. Before that date the NFL teams marketed their IP rights individually. Between 1963 and 2000, the NFLP granted nonexclusive licenses to various suppliers permitting the manufacture and resale of apparel bearing team insignias. Petitioner, American Needle, Inc., was one of those license holders. In December 2000, the teams voted to authorize the NFLP to grant exclusive licenses from then on. The NFLP granted a 10-year exclusive license to Reebok to manufacture and sell trademarked headwear bearing team insignia of all 32 teams. After that the NFLP declined to renew American Needle's nonexclusive license.Opinion of the Court
The Court held that NFL teams are distinct economic actors with separate economic interests that are capable of conspiring under §1 of the Sherman Act.Grady, Mark F. ''Cases and Materials on Antitrust''. UCLA Academic Publishing, Los Angeles, CA. 2011, p. 346-48See also
* '' Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football League'' * ''References
Further reading
*He, Yifei ''American Needle Upon Remand,'' https://ssrn.com/abstract=2520044External links
* 2010 in American football 2010 in United States case law National Football League controversies National Football League litigation United States antitrust case law United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court {{SCOTUS-stub