Ahl-i Hadith

Ahl-i Hadith or Ahl-e-Hadith ( bn, আহলে হাদীছ, hi, एहले हदीस, ur, اہلِ حدیث, ''people of hadith'') is a Salafi reform movement that emerged in North India in the mid-nineteenth century from the teachings of Sayyid Ahmad Shahid, Syed Nazeer Husain and Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan. It is an offshoot of the 19th-century India
Tariqah-i-Muhammadiya
movement tied to the 18th-century traditions of Shah Waliullah Dehlawi and the Wahhabi movement. The adherents of the movement described themselves variously as "''Muwahideen''" and as "''Ahl e-Hadith''".

Initially coterminous with the so-called (Indian) "Wahhabis", the movement emerged as a distinct group around 1864, having claimed the appellation of "''Ahl-i Hadith''" to highlight its commitment to the body of '' ḥadīth''—statements attributed to Muhammad, validated through chains of transmission—and its political quietism. The movement was noteworthy for its robust opposition to practices associated with the veneration of saints, which they regarded as a breach of the doctrine of ''Tawḥīd'' (Islamic monotheism). Its adherents profess to hold the same views as those of the early Ahl al-Hadith school. They reject '' taqlid'' (following legal precedent) and favour '' ijtihad'' (independent legal reasoning) based on the scriptures. Today, the terms "''Salafi''" and "''Ahl-i Hadith''" are often used interchangeably, the movement shares doctrinal tendencies with the Hanbali school prevalent in the Arabian Peninsula, and many of its members have identified themselves with the Zahiri school of thought. Some believe it possesses some notable distinctions from the mainly Arab Salafis.Daniel W. Brown, ''Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought'': Vol. 5 of Cambridge Middle East Studies, p. 32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Holding considerable influence amongst the urban Islamic intellectual circles of South Asia, the ''Ahl-i Hadith'' consolidated themselves into the All India ''Ahl-i-Hadith'' Conference in 1906 and, in Pakistan, formed a political wing in the Jamiat Ahle Hadith in 1986. The movement has drawn support and funding from Saudi Arabia.

History

Origins

Imam Shah Waliullah Dehlawi (1703 - 1762 C.E) is considered as the intellectual fore-forefather of the ''Ahl-i-Hadith''. After his Pilgrimage to Mecca, Shah Waliullah Dehlawi spent 14 months in Medina, studying ''Qur'an'', ''Hadith'' and works of the classical Hanbali theologian Ibn Taymiyya (d. 728 A.H/ 1328 C.E) under the ''hadith'' scholar Muhammad Tahir al-Kurani, the son of Ibrahim al-Kurani. Upon return to India, he preached ''Tawhid'' and a return to the ''Sunnah'', and claimed '' Ijtihad'' just like Ibn Taymiyya. Shah maintained that ''Ijtihad'' is essential for Muslim scholars for all ages since cognizance of Divine injunctions related to the novel issues of each era is obligatory. He also opposed various rituals of saint veneration and customs at saint's tombs which he held to be idolatrous. Shah's campaigns against '' bid'ah'' (religious innovations), emphasis on ''Ijtihad'' as well as his political activities were immensely influenced by Ibn Taymiyya. His precepts for reviving an Islamic Caliphate modelled on the '' Khulafa al-Rashidun'' as elucidated in his treatises like ''Izalat al-Khifa'', ''Qurrat al-'Aynayn'', etc. echoed the doctrines propounded by Ibn Taymiyya during the 14th/7th century.

After the death of his father, Shah 'Abd al-Aziz continued the works of Shah Waliullah. He was a ''Muhaddith'' who emphasized the importance of ''Hadith'' with students all across the subcontinent. As a teacher, preacher and social religious-reformer, Shah 'Abd al-Aziz was closely monitoring the socio-political developments in the subcontinent. British were gaining ascendancy in India by capturing power in Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. In 1799, British defeated the Kingdom of Mysore in the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War. When the British armies entered Delhi in 1803, the Mughal empire was turned into a protectorate of British East India Company, thus gaining political supremacy in the subcontinent. Upon this, Shah 'Abd al-Aziz declared a decisive ''fatwa'' declaring India to be ''Dar-al Harb'' (abode of war). This was the first significant ''fatwa'' against colonial rule in the subcontinent that gave an indirect call to South Asian Muslims to fight colonial occupation and liberate the country. This decisive ''fatwa'' by Shah Waliullah's eldest son and successor, Shah 'Abd al Azeez, calling upon Muslims to strive to restore India back to Islamic rule, would greatly inspire his student Sayyid Ahmed Shahid and motivate him to plan for future ''Jihad''. After a brief period as a mercenary, Sayyid Ahmad would further pursue his religious studies and re-appeared as an eminent religious scholar and a visionary leader, gaining many disciples. He came to be widely identified as the inheritor of Shah Waliullah's mantle and numerous Sunni Muslims volunteered to join his cause.

Indian Jihad Movement

Under these circumstances the call to ''Jihad'' against British rule began becoming popular amongst the Muslim masses. Shah Ismail Dehlvi, the nephew of Shah 'Abd al-Aziz and grandson of Shah Waliullah, would lead a religious revivalist movement. In addition to being an excellent orator, he was also a soldier and military commander. Shah Muhammad Ishaq, the grandson of Shah 'Abd al-Aziz would continue his religious reform after Abdul Aziz's death in 1823. Maulana Abdul Haie, son-in-law of Shah 'Abd al-Aziz was also a reputed scholar. These three theologians prepared the spadework of ''Tariqah-i-Muhammadiyya'', the reform movement that would be known as the Indian "Wahhabi movement". During his last years, Shah 'Abd al-Aziz would give his cloak to Syed Ahmed Bareilly appointing him as his successor. Sayyid Ahmed would campaign against the corruption of various Sufi orders, and initiate his disciples into Tariqah-i-Muhammadiya ("the Muhammadiyya Order"). The disciples in this order were required to make a vow that they will strictly abide by ''Sharia'' and would not follow anything not proven by ''Qur'an'' and ''Hadith''.

One of the prominent disciples of Sayyid Ahmed was Wilayat Ali Khan, a student of '' Hajji'' Abdul Haq of Benares; popularly known as the " Nejdi Sheikh". Abdul Haq was an Islamic scholar who spent years studying in the remote Central Arabian Province of Nejd, the seat of the Wahhabi movement. Upon his return, he preached many of its militant ideals and had already established Wahhabi doctrines in South Asia before Sayyid Ahmad's pilgrimage in 1821. 'Abd al-Haqq would later become a member of ''Tariqah-i Muhammadiya'' and join Sayyid Ahmad's ''Hajj'' to Hejaz in 1821 along with his disciple Wilayat Ali. Unlike other members of the group, 'Abd al-Haqq travelled to Yemen to study under the theologian Muḥammad b. ʿAlī al-Shawkānī (d. 1834) and would become greatly influential in shaping the teachings of ''Ahl-i Hadith''. Meanwhile Wilayat Ali Khan, being a disciple of both Sayyid Ahmad and the Najdi Sheikh, emerged as an important leader of Indian "Wahhabi" movement and its military campaigns of ''Jihad''.

In 1821, Syed Ahmad embarked on a journey for Hajj in Hejaz accompanied by Shah Ismail Dehlvi and Maulana Abdul Haie with 400 disciples. They performed Hajj in 1823 (1237 A.H) and stayed in Hejaz for 8 months. Shah Ismail and Abdul Haie authored the Arabic book "''Sirat e Mustaqim''" to call Arabs to their reformative movement. They returned home in 1824. The three scholars then charted a strategic plan to wage Jihad against the colonial occupation across India. Many parts of the subcontinent became recruitment centres for the '' Mujahideen''. When his Pathan disciples offered him territory, Syed Ahmed set-up the North West Frontier Province as the operations headquarters for the future "Wahhabite" Jihad in 1826 to re-take the subcontinent from the British. However this put the ''Mujahideen'' into conflict with the Sikh empire. In January 1827, Syed Ahmed was elected as Imam and '' Amir-ul-Mu'mineen'' (commander of faithful) by religious scholars and tribal chiefs. Soon war broke out between Sikhs and "Wahhabi" Mujahideen.Dr. Mubarak Ali, �
Almiyah-e-Tarikh”, Chapter 11, pp. 107–121
Fiction House, Lahore (2012).

On 24 February 1828, one of the three leaders of Jihad, Maulvi Abdul Haei, the chief advisor to Syed Ahmed died as an old and ailing person. In his letters to Sikh ruler Ranjit Singh, Syed Ahmed clarified that he didn't seek a confrontation with Sikhs, but only their help in defeating the British. Ranjit Singh, for his part, respected Syed Ahmed as a "courageous, bold and determined person". By 1830, many Pathan tribal chiefs rose against the Wahhabi ''Mujahideen'' and committed massacres against the Wahhabi emigrants. Disillusioned by this, Syed Ahmed lost interest in the movement and made plans to migrate to Arabia. However, senior advisors such as Shah Ismail opposed the idea and sought to complete the objectives of the movement, despite the setbacks.

On 17 April 1831, Syed Ahmed set out on his last journey for Balakot with the aim to capture Kashmir, accompanied by Shah Ismail. A Pashtun chieftain named Zabardast Khan who made a secret deal with the Sikh commander Sher Singh withheld promised reinforcements. On 6 May 1831, an ill-equipped army of 1,000 ''Mujahideen'' faced a 12,000 strong force of Sikh gunmen (''Banduqchis'') led by Sher Singh. On that day Syed Ahmed, Shah Ismail and prominent leaders of the Wahhabi movement fell fighting in the battlefield. Out of the 1000 ''Mujahideen'', 300 died and Sikh casualties were 700 deaths. Sikh victory at Balakot arose jubilation in Lahore. The British government also congratulated Ranjith Singh in his victory. The defeat at Balakot made a devastating blow to the Wahhabi movement.

After the death and defeats of both Sayyid Ahmed Shahid and Shah Ismail Dehlwi; many of his followers continued the Jihad movement across South Asia. Others became the followers of Shah Muhammad Ishaq (1778–1846 C.E), the grandson of Shah 'Abd al-Azeez and head of the ''Madrasa Rahimiyya'' in Delhi. Some of the disciples of Shah Muhammad Ishaq would formally establish the ''Ahl-i Hadith'' movement.

Establishment of ''Ahl-i Hadith''

In the mid-nineteenth century, an Islamic religious reform movement was started in Northern India that continued the ''Tariqah-i-Muhammadiyya'' movement. It rejected everything introduced into Islam after ''Qur'an'', ''Sunnah'', ''Hadith'' and the early eras. This was led by Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan of Bhopal (1832–1890) whose father became a Sunni convert under the influence of Shah 'Abd al-Aziz (1746–1824) and Syed Nazir Husain (1805–1902) who was a student of Muhaddit
Shah Muhammad Ishaq
(1782–1846), the grandson of Shah 'Abd al-Aziz and his ''Khalifa'' (successor). With the aim of restoring Islamic unity and strengthening Muslim faith, they called for a return to original sources of religion,'' "Qur'an and Hadith"'' and eradicate what they perceived as '' bid‘ah'' (innovations), ''shirk'' (polytheism), heresies and superstitions.

Siddiq Hasan’s father Sayyid Awlad Hasan was a strong supporter of Sayyid Ahmad Shahid and had accompanied him to Afghanistan in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to participate in his famous ''Jihad'' movement. Another major source of influence on Khan was the "Najdi Sheikh" 'Abd al-Haqq Benarasi who had returned from Yemen and became the first scholar to teach the doctrines of Yemeni theologian Al-Shawkani in South Asia. Benarasi was Khan's Hadith master in Delhi; teaching him doctrines such as rejection of ''shirk'', ''bid'ah'', ''Taqlid'', etc. and became influential in laying the doctrinal foundations of the later ''Ahl-i Hadith''. Khan also had studied under the tutelage of other notable students of Shawkani such as Nāṣir al-Ḥāzimī, ʿAbd al-Qayyūm Buḍhānawī and the Bhopali scholar Ḥusayn b. Muḥsin al-Yamanī.

Syed Nazeer Husain from Delhi and Siddiq Hasan Khan of Bhopal drew primarily on the work of hadith scholars from Yemen in the early years of the movement, reintroducing the field into the Indian subcontinent. Their strong emphasis on education and book publishing has often attracted members of the social elite both in South Asia and overseas. Alongside the Yemeni reformers, the teachings of Shāh Muḥammad Ismāʿīl Dehlvi (1779–1832 C.E) also became highly important in ''Ahl-i Hadith'' circles. Shah Muhammad's ground-breaking theological works like ''Taqwiyat al-īmān'' (Strengthening of the Faith), ''al-Ṣirāṭ al-Mustaqīm'' (The Straight Path), ''Yak Rūzī'' (One Dayer), etc. elucidated the core doctrines of the ''Ahl-i Hadith'' movement. All these works called upon the believers to uphold the principle of ''Tawhid'' (montheism), and condemned various practices associated with saint-venerations, visitations to tombs, Sufi rituals, etc. as ''shirk'' (polytheism).

Following the teachings of Shah Ismail, ''Ahl-i Hadith'' also rejected '' Taqlid'' to works of classical Sunni ''Fiqh'' (jurisprudence) and believed in direct understanding of ''Qur'an'' and ''Hadith''. Due to their connections with Shah Ismail and Sayyid Ahmad's ''Jihad'' movement, ''Ahl-i Hadith'' were considered as "Wahhabi" conspirators by the British administration. The anti-colonial activism of ''Ahl-i Hadith'' religious reformers as well as their sympathies for Jihad made them the primary target more than any other reform movement. For the British imperial statesmen, their endeavours were part of a wider "Wahhabi" conspiracy. Apart from the British, many Hanafite scholars also were critical of Sayyid Ahmad and his followers. Throughout the 19th century, ''Ahl-i Hadith'' scholars were persecuted under various pretexts during the "Wahhabi trails" (of 1850s–1870s). Eventually the leaders of the movement sought pragmatic accommodation with the British Raj in order to stop the repression campaign against Wahhabis. Upon the petition of ''Ahl-i-Hadith'' scholar Muhammad Hussain Batalvi to the British Indian Administration, the government of India issued a notification in 1886, stopping the use of the term "Wahhabi" in official correspondence. In a victory to reform movement, the government conceded to referring the community as "''Ahl-i Hadith''".

University of Paris political scientist Antoine Sfeir has referred to the movement as having an elitist character which perhaps contributes to their status as a minority in South Asia. Folk Islam and Sufism, commonly popular with the poor and working class in the region, are anathema to ''Ahl-i Hadith'' beliefs and practices. This attitude toward Sufism has brought the movement into conflict with the rival Barelvi movement even more so than the Barelvis perennial rivals, the Deobandis.Arthur F Buehler
Sufi Heirs of the Prophet: the Indian Naqshbandiyya and the Rise of the Mediating Sufi Shaykh
pg. 179. Part of the ''Studies in Comparative Religion'' series. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1998.

In the 1920s, the Ahl-i Hadith opened a center for their movement in Srinagar. Followers of the Hanafi school of law, forming the majority of Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir, socially boycotted and physically attacked ''Ahl-i Hadith'' followers, eventually declaring such followers to be apostates and banning them from praying in mainstream mosques. From the 1930s the group also began to be active in the political realm of Pakistan, with Ehsan Elahi Zaheer leading the movement into a full foray in the 1970s, eventually gaining the movement a network of mosques and Islamic schools. Following other South Asian Islamic movements, the ''Ahl-i Hadith'' now also administer schools and mosques in the English-speaking world. In the modern era, the movement draws both inspiration and financial support from Saudi Arabia, now being favoured over the rival Deobandi movement as a counterbalance to Iranian influence.

Tenets

Its adherents oppose '' taqlid''. They reject being bound by the four mainstream Islamic jurisprudential '' mad'habs'', and the four ''Imams''. Hence they are known as ghair muqallidīn (non-conformists). They repudiate the traditions of the schools of jurisprudence and consider it permissible to seek guidance directly from ''Qur'an'' and authentic ''hadith''. This set them in opposition to the Sufi sects of the subcontinent with whom they often have arguments, and they disagree with followers of the Hanafi school of thought due to jurisprudential differences. Classical treatises of Hanbali theologian Ahmad ibn Taymiyya constitute one of the most important doctrinal references of the ''Ahl-i Hadith''. These works were introduced to them under the influence of prominent Yemeni traditionalist scholar Muhammad Al-Shawkani.

''Ahl-i-Hadith'' movement continues the reform tradition of Shah Waliullah Dehlawi (1703–1762) whom the adherents regard as its first modern member. They also draw upon the teachings of his son Shah 'Abd al-Aziz Muhaddith Dehlavi, his follower Syed Ahmed Barelvi, and the Yemenite ''Qadi'' Muhammad ibn Ali Al-Shawkani (whom they regard as Shaykh al-Islam). Siddiq Hasan Khan's father studied under Shah Abd al-Aziz and Syed Nazir Husain was a student of the Muhaddit
Shah Muhammad Ishaq
a grandson of Shah Waliullah Dehlawi. Due to their reliance on the ''Qur'an'' and ''Hadith'' only and their rejection of ''Qiyas'' (analogical reasoning) in Islamic law, the modern-day ''Ahl-i Hadith'' are often compared to the older Zahirite school of ''Fiqh'' (Islamic law), with which the Ahl-i Hadith consciously identify themselves.

Shah Ismail Dehlvi's book "''Taqwiatul Eiman''" is viewed as the manifesto of the ''Ahl-i-Hadith'' movement. In it he emphasised on the pristine monotheism of Islam and condemned what he viewed as heretic un-Islamic customs that violated ''Tawhid''. Such customs included celebration of death anniversary of ''Awliyaa'' (saints), asking their mercy or invoking Allah's blessing through them. ''Ahl-i Hadith'' condemned practices such as visiting the Prophet's grave and various customs related to saint veneration fervently, in a tone which rivaled in intensity to that of the Arabian ''Muwahhidun'' movement.

While their educational programs tend to include a diverse array of Muslim academic texts, few adherents of the movement ascribe themselves to one school of Muslim jurisprudence, placing a greater emphasis on personal responsibility to derive judgments and ritual practice. While the movement's figureheads have ascribed to the Zahirite legal school, with a great number of them preferring the works of Yemeni scholar Shawkani, the generality of the movement is described as respecting all Sunni schools of Islamic law while preferring to take directly from the Qur'an, prophetic tradition and '' 'Ijma'' (consensus) of the early generations of Muslims. While the movement has been compared to Salafist movement in Arab nations and been branded as Wahhabist by the opposing Barelwi movement, the ''Ahl-i Hadith'' remain similar to yet distinct from Salafists.

According to Islamic scholar Muhammad Asadullah Al-Ghalib, the aim and objective of the ''Ahl-i Hadith'' movement is:

"To earn the satisfaction of Allah by preaching and establishing unmixed Tawheed and by following properly the ''Kitab'' and ''Sunnah'' in all spheres of life. The social and political aim of Ahle hadeeth movement is to make all out reforms of the society through the reforms of ''Aqeedah'' and ''Amal''."

Practices

Like other Islamic reform movements, the ''Ahl-i Hadith'' are distinguished by certain common features and beliefs. The men tend to have a particular style of untrimmed beard often considered a visual indicator. In regard to ritual acts of '' 'Ibadah'' (Islamic acts of worship), the movement's practices are noticeably different from the Hanafi ''madh'hab'' (legal school) which predominates in South Asia; the men hold their hands above the navel when lined up for congregational prayer, raise them to the level of their heads before bowing, and say "Ameen" out loud after the prayer leader. ''Ahl-i Hadith'' call for a return to the first principles and for a revival of "the original simplicity and purity to faith and practices." They are also opposed to foreign customs and beliefs that crept into Muslim societies as well as foreign philosophical thoughts and Sufi mystical concepts such as '' Ma'rifat''. The movement also distinguished itself from the Wahhabi movement, which followed the Hanbali legal school and its rulings, while the ''Ahl-i Hadith'' adherents considered themselves as following no single ''madh'hab'' (legal school).

Breaking with the dominant Hanafi and Sufi customs, they also emphasise the fraternity and equality of all Muslims; such as permitting Muslim women to pray in '' Masjids'', addressing the '' Khutbah'' (Friday sermons) to both villagers and city-dwellers in the native languages, making divorce procedure easy and accessible to women, rejecting '' triple Talaq'', authorising marriage contracts between poor and affluent classes of the society, etc. Other key themes include living a pious and disciplined life by working hard; and attainment of '' Ihsan'' (spiritual perfection) through virtuous deeds. While the movement became popular amongst the affluent urban classes, it also has considerable sway in the rural regions.

According to Professor Abdul Ali, former chairman and Director of the Department of Islamic Studies, Aligarh Muslim University:

"The ''Ahl-i- Hadith movement'' was inspired by the school of thought of Shah Wali Allah of Delhi, who in the eighteenth century, imparted renewed emphasis on the study of ''Hadith'', and raised his voice against the principle of '' taqlid'' in legal matters by justifying the principle of '' ijtihad'', which gave Hadith the right of primacy over the rulings of the juristic schools. This particular trend in Shah Wali Allah's thought became the starting point of ''Ahl-i- Hadith'' movement... The ''Ahl-i- Hadith'' movement which was started in India in the nineteenth century was quite different from that of Wahhabism, because it drew its inspiration not from Muhammad bin 'Abd al-Wahhab of Najd but from his Indian contemporary Shah Waliullah of Delhi. At the same time... both these movements had some elements of religious purification in their rejection of ''taqlid'' and innovation."

Relations with Other Reform Movements

With Wahhabi Movement

With ''Salafiyya'' Movement

The early '' Salafiyya'' reformers of the Arab World would influence and impart influence on ''Ahl-i-Hadith'' scholars. The Iraqi Salafi scholar Khayr Al-Din Al-'Alusi (d. 1317 A.H/ 1899 C.E) corresponded with ''Ahl-i-Hadith'' scholar Siddiq Hassan Khan and praised him as a religious reformer. Influenced by ''Ahl-i-Hadith'', Salafi scholars like Sayyīd Rashīd Ridá (d. 1354 A.H/ 1935 C.E) would call for a non-''madhab'' or pre-''madhab'' approach to ''Fiqh'' (Jurisprudence). 'Abd al-Baqi al-Afghani (d. 1905) who was influenced by ''Ahl-i-Hadith'' in the subcontinent would also be active the reform movements in Syria. Syrian Islamic scholar Muhammad Nasir al-Din al-Albani too would be highly influenced by ''Ahl-i-Hadith'' and would be known as an excellent '' Muhaddith''. The ''Salafiyya'' ''ulema'' shared with the ''Ahl-i-Hadith'', a common interest in opposing various Sufi practices, denounce '' Taqlid'' (blind following), reviving correct theology and ''Hadith'' sciences.

Organizations

Leading proponents of the movement joined forces against the opposition they faced from established ''ulama'' (religious scholars) and in 1906 formed the All India ''Ahl-i-Hadis'' Conference. The ''Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadees'' was represented in the All India Azad Muslim Conference, which opposed the partition of India. One member organization of the All India Ahl-i-Hadis Conference is the ''Anjuman-i-Hadith'', formed by students of Sayyid Miyan Nadhir Husain and divided into Bengal and Assam wings. After the 1947 separation of India and Pakistan, the Pakistani ''Ahle-Hadith'' center was based in and around Karachi.

In 1930 ''Ahl-i Hadith'' was founded as a small political party in India. In Pakistan, the movement formed a political party, Jamiat Ahle Hadith, which unlike similar Islamic groups opposed government involvement in affairs of ''sharia'' law.Roy, Olivier, ''The Failure of Political Islam'', by Olivier Roy, translated by Carol Volk, Harvard University Press, 1994, p.118-9 Their leader, Ehsan Elahi Zaheer, was assassinated in 1987. The ''Ahl-i Hadith'' opposes Shi'i doctrines.

Funding

Millions of dollars in Saudi funding has also been given into Indian and Pakistani Ahle Hadith madrassas, militant organizations and educational institutions.

Demographics

During the rule of the British Raj, no accurate census was ever taken of the movement's exact number of followers. The group itself claims 22 millions followers in India and 10 millions in Pakistan as well 25 millions in Bangladesh with strongholds in 40 districts of the country.

In the United Kingdom, the Ahl-i Hadith movement maintains 42 centers and boasts a membership which was estimated at 5,000 during the 1990s and 9,000 during the 2000s. Although the movement has been present in the UK since the 1960s, it has not been the subject of extensive academic research and sources on the movement are extremely limited and rare.

Relationship with other Muslim sects

Subcontinent

The relations of ''Ahl-i Hadith'' with other Islamic sects and movements in the subcontinent is complex. The ''Ahl-i Hadith'' is opposed to practices associated with Sufi ''Awliyaa'' (saints) and god-men. In Pakistan, although majority of Salafis shun violence, some ''Ahl-i Hadith'' organizations advocate militant actions. The Ahl-i Hadith militant organizations such as Lashkar e-Taiba, an armed wing of Markaz al-Dawah Irshad (MDI), have targeted Indian security forces as well as Barelvis, Shias and Ahmadis. Another organisation, Tehreek e-Mujahideen (an armed Wing of Markazi Jamiat Ahle Hadith), has targeted Indian security forces in the contested state of Kashmir. During the Afghan Jihad of 1980s, the Pakistani state encouraged madrassas to fight the Soviet forces, militarizing many organizations including Salafi/Ahle Hadith groups. In sharp contrast, Indian Salafists have been regarded as being “peaceful” and “non-violent.” The Indian Ahle Hadith movement has largely remained apolitical, focusing primarily on religious issues and also encourage participation in the democratic process. While the organization Lashkar-e-Taiba has recruited followers of the ''Ahl-i Hadith'' movement in the past, the organization's views on jihad alienate the mainstream adherents of the ''Ahl-i Hadith'' movement. Lashkar e-Taiba is also accused by the Indian government for conducting various attacks on Indian soil including the 2008 Mumbai attacks that killed more than 160 people.

Afghanistan

When the Deobandi Taliban first came to power in Afghanistan in the 1990s, they had suppressed Salafist trends. However, after the post-9/11 US Invasion of Afghanistan, Taliban was forced to ally with Salafists. Many Salafist footsoldiers and ''Ahl-i Hadith'' organisations joined the Taliban insurgency (2001–2021) under the Afghan Taliban's command. After Taliban victory in the War in Afghanistan and Restoration of the Islamic Emirate, hundreds of ''Ahl-i Hadith'' ''ulema'' would gather to announce their '' Bay'ah'' (pledge of allegiance) to the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. Number of ''Ahl-i Hadith'' clerics and their representatives held gatherings across various provinces of Afghanistan to re-affirm their backing of the Taliban and officially declare their support to the Taliban crackdown on IS-K.

Prominent Ahl-i Hadith figures

Scholastic

Political/militant

See also

References

{{reflist

External links

Markazi Jamiat Ahle Hadees HindMarkazi Jamiat Ahle Hadees Pakistan

Markazi Jamiat e Ahlihadith Jammu And Kashmir

Al-Markazul Islami As-SalafiAhlehadeeth Andolon Bangladesh


Sunni Islamic branches
Islamism in Pakistan
Islam in India
Salafi movement
Islam in Afghanistan
Islam in Africa
Islam in Asia
Islam in Azad Kashmir
Islam in Bangladesh