Augustinian–Calvinism

Augustine's Influence on John Calvin describes how Augustinianism shaped Calvinism, particularly in its soteriological aspects and understanding of divine providence. Both Reformed theologians and John Calvin himself acknowledged the profound impact of Augustine of Hippo, the fourth-century church father, on Calvin's theology. Augustine's debates with the Pelagians provided the occasion for him to develop his own soteriology, which was notably influenced by his pre-conversion adherence to Stoic and Manichean teachings.

Developments of Calvinist soteriology

Acknowledgement of Augustine influence on Calvin

John Calvin wrote, "Augustine is so much at one with me that, if I wished to write a confession of my faith, it would abundantly satisfy me to quote wholesale from his writings."

"This is why one finds that every four pages written in the ''Institutes of the Christian Religion'' John Calvin quoted Augustine. Calvin, for this reason, would deem himself not a Calvinist, but an Augustinian. ..Christian Calvinist, should they be more likely deemed an Augustinian-Calvinist?", explains, Reformed theologian C. Matthew McMahon. Specialist of Augustine, Phillip Cary concurs, writing, "As a result, Calvinism in particular is sometimes referred to as Augustinianism."

Twentieth-century Reformed theologian B. B. Warfield said, "The system of doctrine taught by Calvin is just the Augustinianism common to the whole body of the Reformers." Reformed theologian, Paul Helm, used the term "Augustinian Calvinism" for his view in the article "The Augustinian-Calvinist View" in ''Divine Foreknowledge: Four Views''.

Summary of Calvinist soteriology

The soteriology of Calvin was further shaped and systematized by Beza and other theologians. It was then articulated during the Second Synod of Dort (1618–1619) in response to the opposing ''Five Articles of Remonstrance''. A basic summary of the Canon of Dort is given by the five points of Calvinism: Total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and perseverance of the saints. Modern Reformed theologians continues to assert these points as a simple summary of the Calvinist soteriological doctrines.

Developments of Augustine's soteriology

Theological influences in the early church

Manichaeism was a Gnostic sect founded in the 3rd century. It significantly influenced early Christian churches, introducing spiritual practices like asceticism and sacerdotalism. Manichaeism adopted a dualistic worldview, contrasting a spiritual realm of good with a material realm of evil, anticipating the gradual restoration of light from the material to the spiritual realm. In terms of soteriology, it maintained that God unilaterally selected the elect for salvation and the non-elect for damnation according to His will. For instance, in 392, a Manichean presbyter said that "God ..has chosen souls worthy of Himself according to His own holy will. ..that under His leadership those souls will return hence again to the kingdom of God according to the holy promise of Him who said: “I am the way, the truth, and the door”; and “No one can come unto the Father, except through me.”".

Early church fathers prior to Augustine of Hippo (354–430) refuted non-choice predeterminism as being pagan. Out of the fifty early Christian authors who wrote on the debate between free will and determinism, all fifty supported Christian free will against Stoic, Gnostic, and Manichean determinism.

Theological influences on Augustine

Before his conversion to Christianity in 387, Augustine adhered to three deterministic philosophies: Stoicism, Neoplatonism and Manichaeism. He was significantly influenced by them, especially during his decade-long association with the Manichaeans. He seemed to adopt Manichean perspectives on various theological aspects, notably on the nature of good and evil, the separation of groups into elect, hearers, and sinners, and the hostility to the flesh and sexual activity, and his dualistic theology.

After his conversion, he taught traditional Christian theology against forms of theological determinism until 412. However, during his conflict with the Pelagians, he seemed to reintroduce certain Manichean principles into his thought, and was accused by his opponents of doing so. For the rest of his life, he taught a soteriology where predestination is based on predeterminism. This soteriology can be articulated similarly to the five points of Calvinism.

Total depravity and unconditional election in infant baptism

The controversy over infant baptism with the Pelagians contributed to Augustine's change. Tertullian (c. 155 – c. 220) was the first Christian to mention infant baptism. He refuted it by saying children should not be baptized until they can personally believe in Christ. Even by 400, there was no consensus regarding why infants should be baptized. The Pelagians taught infant baptism merely allowed children to enter the kingdom of God (viewed as different than heaven), so that unbaptized infants could still be in heaven. In response, Augustine invented the concept that infants are baptized to remove Adam's original guilt (guilt resulting in eternal damnation). Inherited original sin was previously limited to physical death, moral weakness, and a sin propensity.

Another key element within infant baptism was Augustine's early training in Stoicism, an ancient philosophy in which a meticulous god predetermines every detailed event in the universe. This included the falling of a leaf from a tree to its exact location on the ground and the subtle movements of muscles in roosters' necks as they fight, which he explained in his first work, ''De providentia'' (''On Providence''). Augustine taught that God foreordained (or predestined) newborn babies who were baptized by actively helping or causing the parents to reach the bishop for baptism while the baby lived. By baptism, these babies would be saved from damnation. Augustine reasoned further that God actively blocked the parents of other infants from reaching the baptismal waters before their baby died. These babies were condemned to hell due to lack of baptism (according to Augustine). His view remains controversial, even some Roman Catholic Augustinian scholars refute this idea, and scholars cite the view's origin as derived as from Platonism, Stoicism, and Manichaeism.

Augustine then expanded this concept from infants to adults. Since babies have no "will" to desire their baptisms, Augustine expanded the implication to all humans. He concluded that God must predestine by predetermination all humans prior to them making any choice. Although earlier Christians taught original sin, the concept of total depravity (total inability to believe on Christ) was borrowed from Gnostic Manichaeism. Manichaeism taught unborn babies and unbaptized infants were damned to hell because of a physical body. Like the Gnostics, the Manichaean god had to resurrect the dead will by infusing faith and grace. Augustine changed the cause of total depravity to Adam's guilt but kept the Stoic, Manichaean, and Neoplatonic concepts of the human dead will requiring god's infused grace and faith to respond.

Limited atonement

Augustine attempted numerous explanations of 1 Timothy 2:4. The Pelagians assumed 1 Tim. 2:4 taught that God gave the gift of faith to all persons, which Augustine easily refuted by changing wills/desires to "provides opportunity". In 414, Augustine's new theology has "all kinds/classes" definitively replacing "all" as absolute (ep. 149) and in 417, Sermon 304.2 repeats this change of "all" to "all kinds". But only in 421 did Augustine alter the text to read "all who are saved" meaning those who are saved are only saved by God's will, which he repeats the next year. People fail to be saved, "not because they do not will it, but because God does not". Despite their certain damnation, God makes other Christians desire their impossible salvation. John Rist identifies as "the most pathetic passage." By 429, Augustine quotes 1 Corinthians 1:18 adding "such" to 1 Tim. 2:4, redefines all to mean as "all those elected," and implies an irresistible calling. Hwang noted,

Augustine attempted at least five answers over a decade of time trying to explain 1 Tim. 2:4 regarding the extent of Christ's redeeming sacrifice. His major premise was the pagan idea that God receives everything he desires. Omnipotence (Stoic and Neoplatonic) is doing whatever the One desires, ensuring everything that occurs in the universe is exactly the Almighty's will and so must come to pass (Sermon 214.4). He concluded that because God gets everything he wants, God does not desire all persons to be saved, otherwise every human would be saved. Chadwick concluded that because Augustine's God does not desire and so refuses to save all persons, Augustine elevated God's sovereignty as absolute and God's justice was trampled. This also logically demanded that Christ could not have died for those who would not be saved. Therefore, Christ only died for the elect since God does not waste causation or energy.

Irresistible grace

Augustine, developed the concepts of "prevenient grace", "operative grace" and "cooperative grace". In response to Pelagianism, Augustine's argued that prevenient grace is necessary to prepare the human will for conversion. Pelagius had appealed to St. Ambrose (c. 339 – c. 397), to which Augustine replied a series of quotations from Ambrose which indicated the need for prevenient grace. Augustine described free will without the spiritual aid of grace as, "captive free will" ( la, liberum arbitrium captivatum). Through the action of grace, this will becomes a "freed will" or literally a "freed free will" ( la, liberum arbitrium liberatum). Prevenient grace provides this necessary spiritual enlightenment. The subsequent "operative grace" grants the elect only the power to believe and kindles justifying faith. Augustine considered operative grace as a justifying grace infallible for the elect. However, he did not use the term "irresistible grace" to describe it.

Perseverance of the saints

Since Augustine believed that the Holy Spirit is received at water baptism, producing regeneration, he had to explain why some baptized infants continued in the faith while others fell away and lived immoral lives. Augustine taught that among those regenerated through baptism, some are given an additional gift of perseverance () which enables them to maintain their faith and prevents them from falling away. Without this second gift, a baptized Christian with the Holy Spirit would not persevere and ultimately would not be saved. Augustine developed this doctrine of perseverance in (). While this doctrine theoretically give security to the elect who receive the gift of perseverance, individuals cannot ascertain whether they have received it.

Double predestination

Double predestination, or the double decree, is the doctrine that God actively reprobates, or decrees damnation of some persons, as well as salvation for those whom he has elected. After 411, Augustine made statements that teach this doctrine (e.g., Enchir. 100, De nat. orig. 1.14, 4.16, Serm.229S, Serm.260D.1, De civ. dei 14.26, 15.1, ep.204.2), but persons relying primarily on Augustine's writings prior to 412 are not clear whether he held to double predestination. In ep.225 (from Prosper) and ep.226 (from Hilary of Gaul), both men complained that fellow Christians did not want Augustine's dangerous new view of predestination and perseverance preached because it rejected the traditional view of election based upon God's foreknowledge, replacing it with a 'predestination' as "necessity based upon fate" (ep.225.3). Hilary complained, "But they do not want this perseverance to be preached if it means that it can neither be merited by prayer not lost by rebellion" (ep.226.4; cf. Persev.10). Persons who later taught that same double predestination they found within Augustine's writings, such as Gottschalk of Orbais and the Jansenists, were condemned by the church.

During the Protestant Reformation, John Calvin also held double predestinarian views. John Calvin states: "By predestination we mean the eternal decree of God, by which he determined with himself whatever he wished to happen with regard to every man. All are not created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of these ends, we say that he has been predestinated to life or to death."

See also

*Neoplatonism and Christianity
*Five Points of Calvinism
*Predestination in Calvinism

References

Sources

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* {{cite book , language=en , last=Wilson , first=Kenneth , title=Augustine's Conversion from Traditional Free Choice to "Non-free Free Will: A Comprehensive Methodology , location=Tübingen , publisher=Mohr Siebeck , date=2018

Calvinist theology
Augustine of Hippo