''Aubry v Éditions Vice-Versa Inc'',
9981 S.C.R. 591, was a decision by the
Supreme Court of Canada
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC; , ) is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants eac ...
in which the claimant, Pascale Claude Aubry, brought an action against ''Éditions Vice-Versa'' for publishing a photo taken of her in public. She claimed the photographing was a violation of her right to
privacy
Privacy (, ) is the ability of an individual or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves, and thereby express themselves selectively.
The domain of privacy partially overlaps with security, which can include the concepts of a ...
under the
Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. The Court held that under Quebec law a photographer can take photographs in public places but may not publish the picture unless permission has been obtained from the subject.
The Court limited this requirement to exclude persons whose photographs were taken during an event of public interest. That is, a person of public interest or equally an unknown person who is implicated in a public matter cannot claim image rights. Consequently, anyone whose photograph was incidental to a photo of some matter will be treated as part of the background and will not be able to claim their rights were violated.
Background
In 1987, Gilbert Duclos, a photographer for ''Éditions Vice-Versa'' took a photograph of a teenaged Pascale Claude Aubry resting on the steps of a building by a public street in Montreal. The photo was published in an edition issue alongside essays about life in Montreal and Vancouver. After Aubry's classmates saw the photo and laughed at her, she initiated a lawsuit against the magazine and the photographer.
Both sides agreed that the photo was taken in a public place and without Aubry's consent. Aubry argued that the photograph violated her privacy rights under Section 4 of the ''
Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms,'' which says that “
ery person has a right to respect for his private life.” ''Éditions Vice-Versa'' argued that such an interpretation would violate its Section 3 right to free expression found in the same document.
Aubry was awarded $1500 in damages in the lower courts, and the defendants appealed the decision from the
Quebec Court of Appeal
The Court of Appeal of Quebec (sometimes referred to as Quebec Court of Appeal or QCA; ) is the highest judicial court in Quebec, Canada. It hears cases in Quebec City and Montreal.
History
The court was created on May 30, 1849, as the Court ...
to the Supreme Court.
Ruling
The Court held that under Quebec law a photographer can take photographs in public places but may not publish the picture unless permission has been obtained from the subject.
The Court limited this requirement to exclude persons whose photographs were taken during an event of public interest. That is, a person of public interest or equally an unknown person who is implicated in a public matter cannot claim image rights. Consequently, anyone whose photograph was incidental to a photo of some matter will be treated as part of the background and will not be able to claim their rights were violated.
Aftermath
Photojournalist and photographers groups took issue with the decision, arguing that it had the potential to create a
chilling effect
In a legal context, a chilling effect is the inhibition or discouragement of the legitimate exercise of natural and legal rights by the threat of legal sanction. A chilling effect may be caused by legal actions such as the passing of a law, th ...
on their profession. Justice Bastarache later referred to the case in ''
Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem'' (2004), to discuss how the Quebec Charter is relevant to personal disputes.
[''Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem'', para. 153.] The photo became part of the public domain since it was handed to the Supreme Court.
By the time of the decision in April 1998, ''Éditions Vice-Versa'' was defunct.
See also
*
List of Supreme Court of Canada cases
The Supreme Court of Canada is the court of last resort and final appeal in Canada. Cases successfully appealed to the Court are generally of national importance. Once a case is decided, the Court publishes written reasons for the decision, that ...
References
External links
*
* Article concerning the photographer's ongoing campaign to overturn the rulin
{{DEFAULTSORT:Aubry v Editions Vice-Versa Inc
Supreme Court of Canada cases
1998 in Canadian case law
Privacy in Canada
Canadian privacy case law
Quebec case law
Quebec law
Photography in Canada
History of photography