Morphology
''Ascarina'' plants are divided into three major species groups, based on the number of stamens per male flower, number of supporting flower bracts and geographic location. The flowers of the ''Ascarina'' species are unisexual, containing one to five stamens in male flowers, and a single carpel in females. The exception to this is '' A. lucida'', which can haveEcology
Most ''Ascarina'' are endemic to high humidity montane forests (''1000m''-3300m elevation), with an exception of ''A. lucida'' (0m-1500m elevation). The plants grow best in sunny disturbed regions, a trait shared with its sister genus ''Hedyosmum'', but not with the other two genera of ''Chloranthaceae''. The sole exception to this amongst the genus is '' A. swamyana'', which grows best in shady regions. ''Ascarina'' and ''Hedyosmum'' were among the first angiosperms to recruit seedlings in brighter areas, and this ability to grow in open areas has been proposed as the explanation for ''Ascarina'' being anemophilous. The ''Chloranthaceae'' were one of the most widespread of the basal angiosperm groups, and as such ''Ascarina'' was very widespread in the mid Eocene and the early Pleistocene epochs. Fossil records show ''Ascarina'' pollen to be much more widespread during those time periods than it is currently, due to a more suitable climate and fewer competitors. This wide spread of the genus likely explains its presence on Madagascar as a species of ''Ascarina'' developed on the African continent was carried by wind to Madagascar, where environmental conditions were favorable to its continuing survival. The present day range of ''Ascinara'' is much less than what it used to be, as a result of both climatic changes and increased competition. In New Zealand in particular, the range of ''A. lucida'' has decreased. This is not a result of a pollen limitation, as ''Ascarina'' produces enough pollen to spread far beyond its habitable range, and even cross water to islands near New Zealand, but rather its vulnerability to both drought and frost. ''A. lucida'' grew reliably in regions of approximately 1500mm rainfall, and abundantly in areas of approximately 2500mm rainfall. In addition, a light frost would cause severe damage to leaves and flower buds. ThisResearch
Flower morphology and reduction
The main point of contention in research of ''Ascarina'' lies in the primitive nature of the flower. ''Ascarina'' flowers are naked and unisexual with one carpel in females, and between one and five in males. The male flowers have a morphology that suggests that they have been reduced from a more evolved form, rather than simply retaining more primitive features. There are several pieces of evidence that indicate the reduction of the ''Ascarina'' genera. The main evidence stems from the fact that ''Ascarina'' is the sole genus of ''Chloranthaceae'' which has flowers that can contain more than one stamen. Another feature indicative of reduction lies with the bisexual flowers which some ''Ascarina'' species produce. However, it is still uncertain whether these unique morphologies are the result of a secondary evolution, or were inherited from a lost ancestor.''Clavatipollenites hughesii''
There has been some debate and controversy regarding the fossil record of ''Ascarina'' pollen, due to the presence of ''Clavatipollenites hughesii''. The ''Clavatipollenites hughesii'' are a pollen fossil group which has been compared to ''Ascarina'' pollen since being discovered. The ''Clavatipollenites hughesii'' share the same pollen features as ''Ascarina'' and ''Hedyosmum''. Most importantly, these pollen types date back to the early mid Cretaceous epoch, before the time in which ''Chloranthaceae'' were abundant. The similarities between ''Clavatipollenites hughesii'' and ''Ascarina'' pollen are manifold. There is similarity in the pollen shape, with both being monosulcate and with reticulate columnar structure. In addition to this, the ''Clavatipollenites hughesii'' share the less common features of ''Ascarina'' pollen, such as spinules on the mori, which some believe is evidence of a direct link between the species of plants. The shared traits between the two pollen types are not direct proof, as clear differences can be found amongst other pollen types studied under SEM. Therefore, the exact nature of the similarities remains unknown.References
External links