Armourstone

Armourstone is a generic term for broken stone with stone masses between (very coarse aggregate) that is suitable for use in hydraulic engineering. Dimensions and characteristics for armourstone are laid down in European Standard EN13383. In the United States, there are a number of different standards and publications setting out different methodologies for classifying armourstone, ranging from weight-based classifications to gradation curves and size-based classifications.

Stone Classes

European Practice to EN13383

Armourstone is available in standardised stone classes, defined by both a lower and upper value of the stone mass within these classes. For instance, Class 60-300 signifies that up to 10% of the stones weigh less than and up to 30% weigh more than . The standard also mentions values which shouldn't be exceeded by 5% or 3%.

For particular applications like a top layer for a breakwater or bank protection, the median stone mass size, known as ''M''₅₀, is frequently required. This pertains to a category A stone. It doesn't relate to category B stone. There are two main groups: HM and LM, standing for ''Heavy'' and ''Light'' respectively. A stone class might be defined according to EN 13383 as, for instance, HM_A300-1000.

The accompanying graphs offer an overview of all stone classes. A distribution between the two curves in the graph fulfils the criteria for category B. Furthermore, for category A compliance, the ''M_EM'' should intersect the short horizontal line. ''M_EM'' represents the average stone mass, meaning the total sample mass divided by the count of stones in that sample. It's worth noting that in wider ranges, notably 15-300 and 40-400, there's a considerable difference; for the 15-300 class, ''M''₅₀ is 1.57 times the ''M_EM''.

Additionally, there's a defined stone class called CP (''Coarse''). Despite its name suggesting otherwise, the class CP is smaller than LM. This naming convention exists because this class corresponds to the coarse category in the standard for fractional stone used as supplemental material (aggregate). For the CP stone class, size isn't denoted in kg, but in mm. Based on the primary data from standard EN13383, the following table is presented:

Practice in the United States

Several standards and guidelines are identified for classifying armourstone used in coastal and river engineering in the United States, some of which are summarised in the following table:

These standards provide different methodologies for classifying armourstone, ranging from weight-based classifications to gradation curves and size-based classifications. Guidance for the use of large armourstone is given in various USACE publications including the Coastal Engineering Manual.

Median Stone Mass ''M''₅₀

For fine-grained materials, such as sand, the size is typically represented by the median diameter. This measurement is ascertained by sieving the sand. However, for armourstone, producing a sieve curve isn't feasible because the stones are too large for sieving. Therefore, the ''M''₅₀ measurement is employed. It is calculated by obtaining a sample of stones, determining the mass of each stone, arranging these masses by size, and then creating a cumulative mass curve. Within this curve, one can identify the ''M''₅₀ value. It's essential to note that the term median stone mass is technically inaccurate, as the stone with mass ''M''₅₀ doesn't necessarily represent the median stone in the sample.

To illustrate, consider a sample of 50 stones sourced from a quarry in Bulgaria. The blue rectangle is of A4 size. Every stone's weight is individually recorded, and their masses are illustrated in the attached graph. The horizontal axis represents the individual stone mass, while the vertical axis denotes the cumulative mass as a percentage of the entire sample's mass. At the 50% mark, the ''M''₅₀ value is discerned to be 24kg. The true median for this sample is the mean mass of the 25th and 26th stones. In this specific instance, the ''M''₅₀ closely matches the median mass, which is 26kg. This sample meets the criteria for LM_A5-40. However, it's important to note that the sample size is insufficient. According to EN13383, such a sample should comprise at least 200 stones.

Nominal Diameter

Many design formulas do not account for stone mass but rather for diameter. As a result, a method for conversion is required. This method is identified as the nominal diameter. Essentially, it represents the size of a cube's edge that weighs the same as the stone. The formula for this is:
:d_n = \sqrt /math>

Often, the median value is utilised for this purpose, represented as ''d''_''n''50. Typically, the following relationship can be used for conversion:
:$d_ = F_s d_ = 0.84 d_$
Here, ''F_s'' represents the shape factor. The shape factor can vary substantially, typically ranging between 0.7 and 0.9.

Referring to the aforementioned example from Bulgaria, the ''d''_''n''50 was also determined. Given the local stone's density (which is limestone) stands at 2284 kg/m³, the ''d''_''n''50 is calculated to be 22cm. It may be observed that the stones in the sample appear much larger to the eye. This visual misperception can be attributed to a few particularly large stones within the sample, which distort the overall impression.

Additional Parameters

The EN13383 standard elaborates on numerous parameters that define the quality of armourstone. This includes attributes like the shape parameter (measured as Length/Thickness), resistance to fracturing, and the capacity for water absorption. It's pivotal to understand that while the standard delineates how to characterise the quality of armourstone, it doesn't specify the requisite quality for a given application. Such specifics are typically found in design manuals and guidelines, including the Rock Manual.

Establishing the Necessary Stone Weight

When determining the weight of stone required under the influence of waves, one might utilise the (now dated) Hudson Formula or the Van der Meer formula. For computations pertaining to stone weight in flows, the Izbash formula is advisable.

References

{{reflist

Hydraulic engineering