Amphidromus Sowerby on:
[Wikipedia]
[Google]
[Amazon]
''Amphidromus'' is a genus of tropical air-breathing land snails, terrestrial animal, terrestrial pulmonate gastropod mollusks in the family Camaenidae. The shells of ''Amphidromus'' are relatively large, from to in maximum dimension, and particularly colorful. During the 18th century, they were among the first Indonesian land snail shells brought to Europe by travelers and explorers. Since then, the genus has been extensively studied: several comprehensive monographs and catalogs were authored by naturalists and zoologists during the time period from the early 19th to the mid 20th centuries. Modern studies have focused on better understanding the evolution, evolutionary relationships within the group, as well as solving Taxonomy (biology), taxonomic problems.
The genus ''Amphidromus'' is unusual in that it includes species that have Dextral coiling, dextral shell-coiling and species that have Dextral coiling, sinistral shell-coiling. In addition, some species within this genus are particularly notable because their populations simultaneously include individuals with left-handed and right-handed shell-coiling. This is an extremely rare phenomenon, and very interesting to biologists. Studies focused on the soft anatomy of ''Amphidromus'' are scattered and fragmentary. Information on the internal anatomy is known only from a few species, and no larger, comparative morphological study has ever been carried out.
Species in the genus ''Amphidromus'' are arboreal — in other words, they are tree snails. However, more detailed information on their habits is still lacking. The general feeding habits of these snails are unknown, but a few species are known to feed on microscopic fungi, lichens or algae, terrestrial algae. ''Amphidromus'' themselves are preyed upon by birds, snakes, and probably also by smaller mammals such as rats.
The Generic name (biology), generic name is derived from the ancient Greek words ' (), meaning "on both sides", and ' (), meaning "running", alluding to the different chirality, chiralities of the shells. The shells of ''Amphidromus'' are relatively large, and quite colorful; considerable numbers of them were among the first Indonesian land snail shells brought back to Europe by History of Indonesia#Colonial era, travelers and explorers during the 18th century. Comparatively speaking, malacologists have gathered a much smaller number of specimens.
Several species and Form (zoology), forms were described before 1800, most of them with inadequate locality data. At least two names — ''Amphidromus laevus'' (Müller, 1774) and the form ''Amphidromus perversus, A. perversus'' f. ''aureus'' Martyn, 1784 – still (as of 2017) have not yet been reported from a precise locality. During the first half of the nineteenth century, many species and varieties were named, again usually with poor locality data. Not until Eduard von Martens (1867) published his monograph was there an attempt to cover the entire complex of species within this genus. The 1867 monograph contained considerable information both on the variation within the genus, and on the problems of the Zoogeography, geographic distribution of the species. Many concepts that originated with von Martens are still (as of 2017) in use.
In 1896, Hugh Fulton organized 142 specific and varietal names into eighteen species groups containing a total of 64 species. When Henry Augustus Pilsbry's 1900 monograph ''Manual of Conchology''
Henry Augustus Pilsbry, Pilsbry H. A. (1900). ''Manual of Conchology, structural and systematic, with illustrations of the species. Second series: Pulmonata''
Volume 13
Australasian Bulimulidae: ''Bothriembryon'', ''Placostylus''. Helicidae: ''Amphidromus''. 253 pp., 72 plates
page 184
appeared, the number of species in the genus ''Amphidromus'' had increased to 81, and these were placed in nineteen groups. Pilsbry's study has remained the only illustrated monograph of the genus, and it is still considered indispensable for any serious study of the genus. Since 1900, the major Taxonomy (biology), taxonomic studies on ''Amphidromus'' have been faunistics, faunistic (a study of the fauna of some territory or area) in scope. The papers of American malacologist Paul Bartsch (1917, 1918, 1919) on the Philippine species, Bernhard Rensch (1932) on the Lesser Sunda Islands forms, and Tera van Benthem Jutting (1950, 1959)Tera van Benthem Jutting, van Benthem Jutting T. (1950). "Critical studies of the Javanese pulmonate land-shells of the families Helicarionidae, Pleurodontidae, Fruticicolidae and Streptaxidae". ''Treubia'' 20(3): 381–505, 107 figs. on Javan and Sumatran populations are especially comprehensive. Potentially the most valuable contribution is that of Curt Haniel (1921), Curt Haniel, Haniel C. (1921). "Variationsstudie an Timoresischen ''Amphidromus'' Arten". ''Zeits. Induct. Abstamm. und Vererbungsl.'' 25(1–2): 88 pp., 5 plates. who discussed the variation within ''Amphidromus contrarius, A. contrarius'' and ''Amphidromus reflexilabris, A. reflexilabris'' on Timor; the variations in color and form were well illustrated in a series of color plates. Literature published after 1900 contains many scattered descriptions of new color forms and subspecies. Of the 309 names in the nomenclatural list, 111 (35.9%) were published after Pilsbry (1900). Adolf Michael Zilch (1953) listed type specimens in the Senckenberg Museum, and illustrated many previously unfigured species. Frank Fortescue Laidlaw & Alan Solem (1961) recognized 74 species by name, and considered that material from the Banda Islands probably represented an undescribed species. Eleven of the species recognized by Laidlaw & Solem were described after the appearance of Pilsbry's monograph. However, several species recognized by Pilsbry have subsequently been subordinated to subspecific or varietal status, and a few names have been transferred to incertae sedis, since they are based on hundred-year-old references that have not been substantiated by more recent collectors. In fact, the study by Laidlaw & Solem (1961) forms a supplement to Pilsbry's monograph with his extensive plates, and many of Laidlaw & Solem's conclusions concerning the relationships of color forms described as species were taken not so much from new samples, but from the extent of variation that was outlined by Haniel (1921) in his pioneer study.
File:Amphidromus floresianus shell 2.png, In ''Amphidromus floresianus, A. floresianus'', subgenus ''Syndromus'', shell coiling is normally sinistral. Scale bar 10 mm.
File:Amphidromus perversus natunensis shell 2.png, Shells in the amphidromine species ''Amphidromus perversus, A. perversus'' can be dextral, as shown here.
File:Amphidromus perversus natunensis shell 3.png, But shell coiling in ''A. perversus'' can also be sinistral, as shown here.
File:Amphidromus perversus shell.jpg, Abapertural view of a sinistral shell (left), and apertural view of a dextral shell (right) of ''A. perversus''
The whorls of the shell of species of ''Amphidromus'' are moderately convex and, with only a few exceptions, are smooth or have a faint sculpture (mollusc), sculpture of growth lines. However, a sculpture of moderately heavy oblique radial ribs has appeared at least four separate times in the genus, and can be seen in the following species: ''Amphidromus costifer'' Smith from Binh Dinh Province in Vietnam; ''A. begini'' Morlet from Cambodia; ''A. heccarii'' Tapparone-Canefri from Celebes; and the ''A. palaceus''-''A. winteri'' complex from Java and Sumatra. Correlated with the ribbing is a light, monochrome coloration, and a thin shell with a large aperture (mollusc), aperture and a flaring lip. Many solid shells in other species do show a slight roughening of the surface, but this is very different from the ribbed sculpture mentioned above.
The aperture is generally large, varying from about two-fifths to one-third the height of the shell, often within the same population. Usually the lip is at least somewhat expanded, and in forms such as ''Amphidromus reflexilabris, A. reflexilabris'' Schepman and ''A. winteri'' (Pfeiffer) var. ''inauris'' Fulton, the lip can only be called flaring. In ''A. perversus'' (Linnaeus) and most other thick-shelled species, the lip is internally thickened, forming a "roll" in its expansion, and has a very heavy parietal callus. In thin-shelled species, the lip is usually a simple reflected edge. The Umbilicus (mollusc), umbilical area can be partially open, nearly closed, or sealed. This feature sometimes provides a useful criterion for specific identification. The angle of the parietal wall varies, but no precise information on this has been compiled.
Generally the whorls of the shell increase rather regularly in size, however, species which are probably closely related, such as ''A. sinistralis'' (Reeve) and ''A. heccarii'' Tapparone-Canefri, can have quite different degrees of whorl increment. No attempt has been made to express these differences meristically, since most of the available material was inadequate for statistical treatment. Actual dimensions of the shell vary greatly both within and between species. The minimum adult size is about 21 mm high, the observed maximum about 75 mm. There is not much variation in adult size within species: only a few species, notably ''A. maculiferus'', ''Amphidromus sinensis, A. sinensis'' and ''Amphidromus entobaptus, A. entobaptus'', have a variation in adult size that is greater than seven or eight millimeters in total.
The single most major aspect of shell variation within the genus is the color patterning. In general, many arboreal snails are brightly colored, obvious examples being the bulimulid genera ''Drymaeus'' and ''Liguus'', the cepolid ''Polymita'', and the camaenid ''Papuina''. However, ''Polymita'', ''Liguus'' and ''Amphidromus'' are particularly noted for their color variations. The basic ground color of ''Amphidromus'' appears to be yellow, and this color is usually (except for ''Amphidromus entobaptus'') confined to the surface layers of the shell, since worn specimens appear to be nearly devoid of color. In some species the background color is whitish, and a few have dark background colors. The apex (mollusc), apical whorls are pale, purple, brown, or black, and this sometimes varies within a population (as in ''A. quadrasi''). A few species, for example ''Amphidromus schomburgki, A. schomburgki'', have a deciduous green periostracum.
Continuous zonal patterns can take the form of whitish subsuture (gastropod), sutural bands (''A. similis''), heavy subperipheral pigmentation (''Amphidromus perversus, A. perversus'' var. ''infraviridis''), subsutural color lines (''A. columellaris''), broad spiral color bands (''A. metabletus'', ''A. webbi''), or narrow spiral bands (''Amphidromus laevus, A. laevus''). Interrupted zonation can consist of the interruption of bands into spots in (''A. maculatus''); highly irregular splitting of zones (''A. perversus'' vars. ''sultanus'' and ''interruptus''); formation of oblique radial streaks which run parallel to (in ''Amphidromus inversus, A. inversus'') or cross (in ''A. latestrigatus'') the incremental growth lines; or almost every conceivable combination and variation of these factors. Often the pattern will change radically from the apex (mollusc), apex to the body whorl (in ''A. quadrasi'' vars.). The aperture, parietal callus, columella (gastropod), columella, lip, and umbilical region are variously marked with pink, brown, purple, white, or black. Haniel (1921) includes several color plates which clearly demonstrate the extent of color variation within two species of the ''Syndromus'' type. ''A. perversus'' and ''Amphidromus maculiferus, A. maculiferus'' of the subgenus ''Amphidromus'' are equally variable, whereas species such as ''A. inversus'' and ''A. similis'' are almost uniform in coloration.
In shells of most of the species in the subgenus ''Amphidromus'', resting stages are marked by the deposition of a brown or black radial band called a varix (mollusc), varix. This appears to be rare in the subgenus ''Syndromus'', although the shell of ''A. laevus'' does show evidence of interruption of the spiral banding after a resting phase.
File:Amphidromus areolatus reproductive system.png, ''Amphidromus areolatus''; at – atrium; e – epiphallus; fl – flagellum; fo – free oviduct; gd – gametolytic duct; gs – gametolytic sac; ov – oviduct; p – penis; pr – penial retractor muscle; v – vagina; vd – vas deferens
File:Amphidromus flavus reproductive system.png, ''Amphidromus flavus''; at – atrium; e – epiphallus; fl – flagellum; fo – free oviduct; gd – gametolytic duct; gs – gametolytic sac; ov – oviduct; p – penis; pr – penial retractor muscle; v – vagina; vd – vas deferens
File:Amphidromus fuscolabris reproductive system.png, ''Amphidromus fuscolabris''; at – atrium; e – epiphallus; fl – flagellum; fo – free oviduct; gd – gametolytic duct; gs – gametolytic sac; ov – oviduct; p – penis; pr – penial retractor muscle; v – vagina; vd – vas deferens
File:Amphidromus roseolabiatus reproductive system.png, ''Amphidromus roseolabiatus''; ap – appendix; at – atrium; e – epiphallus; fl – flagellum; fo – free oviduct; gd – gametolytic duct; gs – gametolytic sac; ov – oviduct; p – penis; pr – penial retractor muscle; v – vagina; vd – vas deferens
File:Amphidromus syndromoideus reproductive system.png, ''Amphidromus syndromoideus''; ap – appendix; at – atrium; e – epiphallus; fl – flagellum; fo – free oviduct; gd – gametolytic duct; gs – gametolytic sac; ov – oviduct; p – penis; pr – penial retractor muscle; v – vagina; vd – vas deferens
File:Amphidromus xiengensis reproductive system.png, ''Amphidromus xiengensis''; at – atrium; e – epiphallus; fl – flagellum; fo – free oviduct; gd – gametolytic duct; gs – gametolytic sac; ov – oviduct; p – penis; pr – penial retractor muscle; v – vagina; vd – vas deferens
Prior to 1900, the similarity in shape of the shell of ''Amphidromus'' to that of South American tree snails in the family Bulimulidae had misled taxonomists. However, the dissections made by Wiegmann and Jacobi clearly showed that the inner anatomical features of ''Amphidromus'' were the same as those of the Asian-Indonesian Camaenidae, and that the resemblance of the shell of ''Amphidromus'' to that of bulimulids was merely an example of Convergent evolution#Parallel vs. convergent evolution, parallelism.
;Subgenera and species
Laidlaw and Solem (1961) recognized 75 species in the genus ''Amphidromus'', and placed another seven names under ''incertae sedis''. In 2010, 87 species in the genus ''Amphidromus'' were recognized.Chan S.-Y., Tan S.-K. & Abbas J. B. (2008). "On a new species of ''Amphidromus'' (''Syndromus'') (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Camaenidae) from Rotti Island, Indonesia". ''Occasional Molluscan Papers'' 1: 1–5
PDF
Internet Archive
/ref>Chan S.-Y. & Tan S.-K. (2008). "On a new species of ''Amphidromus'' (''Syndromus'') (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Camaenidae) from Sumba Island, Indonesia". ''Occasional Molluscan Papers'' 1: 6–10
PDF
Internet Archive
/ref> Species within the genus ''Amphidromus'' are divided into two subgenera, as in the following list: * Subgenus ''Amphidromus'' Albers, 1850 Originally described as ''Helix perversus'' by Carl Linnaeus, Linnaeus in 10th edition of Systema Naturae, 1758, ''Amphidromus perversus'' is the type species of the genus ''Amphidromus'', by the subsequent designation of Eduard von Martens (1860). Species in the subgenus ''Amphidromus'' are amphidromine (left-handed and right-handed snails occur within the population) with a few exceptions. Four dextral taxa are: ''Amphidromus givenchyi, A. givenchyi'', ''Amphidromus protania, A. protania'', ''Amphidromus schomburgki, A. schomburgki dextrochlorus'' and ''A. inversus annamiticus''; and one sinistral: ''Amphidromus atricallosus, A. atricallosus classiaris''. These species usually have shells which have ht following characteristics: they are large (height often exceeding ); they have a height/width ratio of less than 1.85; and a shell color which is yellowish or greenish. Anatomically they have a long epiphallus and flagellum, and an appendix is usually present. * Subgenus ''Syndromus'' Pilsbry, 1900 All but two species within the subgenus ''Syndromus'' are sinistral. The exceptions are the amphidromine ''Amphidromus glaucolarynx, A. glaucolarynx'' and the dextral ''Amphidromus kruehni, A. kruehni''. The type species of the subgenus ''Syndromus'' is ''Amphidromus contrarius, A. contrarius'' Müller, 1774, by the subsequent designation of Adolf Michael Zilch (1960). Species in the subgenus ''Syndromus'' have smaller shells (height usually less than and height/width ratio greater than 1.85), with variable color pattern. They also have a short epiphallus and flagellum, lacking an appendix. A third possible subgenus, ''Goniodromus'' Bülow, 1905 (type species ''Amphidromus büllowi'' Fruhstorfer, 1905), is also cited in the literature, though its subgeneric status is yet to be confirmed. ;Phylogeny Molecular analyses of partial sequences of 16S rDNA of 18 distinct species carried out by Sutcharit and colleagues (2007) indicate that ''Amphidromus'' is a monophyletic group. In their study, different cladograms obtained through distinct methods such as maximum parsimony, neighbor joining and maximum likelihood were congruent among themselves. Though the cladogram, topology obtained for the subgenus ''Amphidromus'' was fairly consistent with current taxonomy, the phylogeny of sinistral ''Syndromus'' species showed no such correspondence. Also according to their results, enantiomorphy seems to be the plesiomorphy, ancestral state of shell coiling in the genus ''Amphidromus'', which is contrary to the general expectation of dextrally coiled shells as an ancestral condition. Despite being morphologically identical, some specimens supposedly belonging to three species, namely ''Amphidromus semitessellatus'', ''A. xiengensis'' and ''A. areolatus'', apparently had polyphyletic origins of mtDNA haplotypes. This resulted in the same species simultaneously appearing in distinct clades along the topology: for instance, ''A. areolatus'' can be found in two different clades in Sutcharit and colleague's (2007) cladogram, clustered respectively with ''A. xiengiensis'' and also with ''A. semitesselatus''. According to the authors, these results could be explained by convergent evolution, convergent and polymorphism (biology), polymorphic shell color patterns (e.g., the shells of the specimens had very similar colors and shape, though the mtDNA markers showed significant differences). Alternatively, they could also be the result of introgressive hybridization or ancestral polymorphism of mtDNA. In any case, analyses of phylogeography using other markers (Marker gene, nuclear markers or other mtDNA markers) or additional morphological characters would still be necessary to further clarify these issues.
1
225–230
PDF
/ref>
Frank Fortescue Laidlaw, Laidlaw F. F. & Alan Solem, Solem A. (1961)
"The land snail genus ''Amphidromus'': a synoptic catalogue"
''Fieldiana Zoology'' 41(4): 505–720.
Taxonomy and history
The Generic name (biology), generic name is derived from the ancient Greek words ' (), meaning "on both sides", and ' (), meaning "running", alluding to the different chirality, chiralities of the shells. The shells of ''Amphidromus'' are relatively large, and quite colorful; considerable numbers of them were among the first Indonesian land snail shells brought back to Europe by History of Indonesia#Colonial era, travelers and explorers during the 18th century. Comparatively speaking, malacologists have gathered a much smaller number of specimens.
Several species and Form (zoology), forms were described before 1800, most of them with inadequate locality data. At least two names — ''Amphidromus laevus'' (Müller, 1774) and the form ''Amphidromus perversus, A. perversus'' f. ''aureus'' Martyn, 1784 – still (as of 2017) have not yet been reported from a precise locality. During the first half of the nineteenth century, many species and varieties were named, again usually with poor locality data. Not until Eduard von Martens (1867) published his monograph was there an attempt to cover the entire complex of species within this genus. The 1867 monograph contained considerable information both on the variation within the genus, and on the problems of the Zoogeography, geographic distribution of the species. Many concepts that originated with von Martens are still (as of 2017) in use.
In 1896, Hugh Fulton organized 142 specific and varietal names into eighteen species groups containing a total of 64 species. When Henry Augustus Pilsbry's 1900 monograph ''Manual of Conchology'' Henry Augustus Pilsbry, Pilsbry H. A. (1900). ''Manual of Conchology, structural and systematic, with illustrations of the species. Second series: Pulmonata''Volume 13
Australasian Bulimulidae: ''Bothriembryon'', ''Placostylus''. Helicidae: ''Amphidromus''. 253 pp., 72 plates
page 184
appeared, the number of species in the genus ''Amphidromus'' had increased to 81, and these were placed in nineteen groups. Pilsbry's study has remained the only illustrated monograph of the genus, and it is still considered indispensable for any serious study of the genus. Since 1900, the major Taxonomy (biology), taxonomic studies on ''Amphidromus'' have been faunistics, faunistic (a study of the fauna of some territory or area) in scope. The papers of American malacologist Paul Bartsch (1917, 1918, 1919) on the Philippine species, Bernhard Rensch (1932) on the Lesser Sunda Islands forms, and Tera van Benthem Jutting (1950, 1959)Tera van Benthem Jutting, van Benthem Jutting T. (1950). "Critical studies of the Javanese pulmonate land-shells of the families Helicarionidae, Pleurodontidae, Fruticicolidae and Streptaxidae". ''Treubia'' 20(3): 381–505, 107 figs. on Javan and Sumatran populations are especially comprehensive. Potentially the most valuable contribution is that of Curt Haniel (1921), Curt Haniel, Haniel C. (1921). "Variationsstudie an Timoresischen ''Amphidromus'' Arten". ''Zeits. Induct. Abstamm. und Vererbungsl.'' 25(1–2): 88 pp., 5 plates. who discussed the variation within ''Amphidromus contrarius, A. contrarius'' and ''Amphidromus reflexilabris, A. reflexilabris'' on Timor; the variations in color and form were well illustrated in a series of color plates. Literature published after 1900 contains many scattered descriptions of new color forms and subspecies. Of the 309 names in the nomenclatural list, 111 (35.9%) were published after Pilsbry (1900). Adolf Michael Zilch (1953) listed type specimens in the Senckenberg Museum, and illustrated many previously unfigured species. Frank Fortescue Laidlaw & Alan Solem (1961) recognized 74 species by name, and considered that material from the Banda Islands probably represented an undescribed species. Eleven of the species recognized by Laidlaw & Solem were described after the appearance of Pilsbry's monograph. However, several species recognized by Pilsbry have subsequently been subordinated to subspecific or varietal status, and a few names have been transferred to incertae sedis, since they are based on hundred-year-old references that have not been substantiated by more recent collectors. In fact, the study by Laidlaw & Solem (1961) forms a supplement to Pilsbry's monograph with his extensive plates, and many of Laidlaw & Solem's conclusions concerning the relationships of color forms described as species were taken not so much from new samples, but from the extent of variation that was outlined by Haniel (1921) in his pioneer study.
Characterization
Species in the genus ''Amphidromus'' usually have smooth, glossy, brightly colored, elongate or conic, dextrally or sinistrally coiled gastropod shell, shells. The shells are moderately large, ranging from to in maximum dimension, having from 6 to 8 convex whorl (mollusc), whorls. Their color pattern is usually monochromatic yellowish or greenish, but can be variegated. The Aperture (mollusc), aperture is oblique or ovate in shape, without any teeth or folds, and with the aperture height ranging from two-fifths to one-third of total shell height. The peristome is expanded and/or reflected, and is sometimes thickened. The columella may be straight or recurved, and the parietal callus is weak to well-developed, and the umbilicus (mollusc), umbilicus may be open or closed. The radula is spatulate, has cusped teeth arranged in rows, usually with a monocuspid central tooth and bicuspid or tricuspid lateral teeth. The Digestive system of gastropods#Jaw, jaw is thin and weak, with low flat ribs. The pallial region is Sigmurethra, sigmurethrous, with a very long, narrow kidney. The Reproductive system of gastropods, genitalia are that of typical camaenids, with a long seminal receptacle, a short penis with low insertion of the retractor muscle, and a short or long epiphallic caecum (flagellum and appendix). The spermatophores have a pentagonal outline in Cross section (geometry), cross-section. ''Amphidromus'' are typically arboreal animals.Shell description
The gastropod shell, shells of ''Amphidromus'' are relatively large, from one to three inches high, and colorful. ''Amphidromus'' has an elongate-conic or ovate-conic helicoid shell of 5 to 8 whorl (mollusc), whorls. The shell may be thin and fragile, or very heavy and solid, with no known correlation of shell structure with distribution or habitats.Shell coiling
In some species within this genus, the gastropod shell#Chirality in gastropods, shell coils invariably to the right, and in many others just as invariably to the left. However, a significant number of species in this genus are "wikt:amphidromine, amphidromine"; this term means that both left- and right-handed shell coiling are found within the same population. One could say they are "Polymorphism (biology), polymorphic" for the direction of shell coiling, but because there are only two possible types of shell coiling, they are described as "Polymorphism (biology), dimorphic" in coiling. The two types of shell coiling occur in some species in approximately equal numbers, other species have a distinct predominance of one phase. There is as yet no information on the heredity of this character in ''Amphidromus''. Because almost all other species of amphidromine gastropods, such as ones within the genera ''Partula (gastropod), Partula'' and ''Achatinella'', have already become extinct, the genus ''Amphidromus'', containing over 110 species, is uniquely useful for the study of the evolution of asymmetry in animals, and this is why the Conservation biology, conservation of this genus is of essential importance to biologists.Shell shape and sculpture
The whorls of the shell of species of ''Amphidromus'' are moderately convex and, with only a few exceptions, are smooth or have a faint sculpture (mollusc), sculpture of growth lines. However, a sculpture of moderately heavy oblique radial ribs has appeared at least four separate times in the genus, and can be seen in the following species: ''Amphidromus costifer'' Smith from Binh Dinh Province in Vietnam; ''A. begini'' Morlet from Cambodia; ''A. heccarii'' Tapparone-Canefri from Celebes; and the ''A. palaceus''-''A. winteri'' complex from Java and Sumatra. Correlated with the ribbing is a light, monochrome coloration, and a thin shell with a large aperture (mollusc), aperture and a flaring lip. Many solid shells in other species do show a slight roughening of the surface, but this is very different from the ribbed sculpture mentioned above.
The aperture is generally large, varying from about two-fifths to one-third the height of the shell, often within the same population. Usually the lip is at least somewhat expanded, and in forms such as ''Amphidromus reflexilabris, A. reflexilabris'' Schepman and ''A. winteri'' (Pfeiffer) var. ''inauris'' Fulton, the lip can only be called flaring. In ''A. perversus'' (Linnaeus) and most other thick-shelled species, the lip is internally thickened, forming a "roll" in its expansion, and has a very heavy parietal callus. In thin-shelled species, the lip is usually a simple reflected edge. The Umbilicus (mollusc), umbilical area can be partially open, nearly closed, or sealed. This feature sometimes provides a useful criterion for specific identification. The angle of the parietal wall varies, but no precise information on this has been compiled.
Generally the whorls of the shell increase rather regularly in size, however, species which are probably closely related, such as ''A. sinistralis'' (Reeve) and ''A. heccarii'' Tapparone-Canefri, can have quite different degrees of whorl increment. No attempt has been made to express these differences meristically, since most of the available material was inadequate for statistical treatment. Actual dimensions of the shell vary greatly both within and between species. The minimum adult size is about 21 mm high, the observed maximum about 75 mm. There is not much variation in adult size within species: only a few species, notably ''A. maculiferus'', ''Amphidromus sinensis, A. sinensis'' and ''Amphidromus entobaptus, A. entobaptus'', have a variation in adult size that is greater than seven or eight millimeters in total.
Shell coloration
The single most major aspect of shell variation within the genus is the color patterning. In general, many arboreal snails are brightly colored, obvious examples being the bulimulid genera ''Drymaeus'' and ''Liguus'', the cepolid ''Polymita'', and the camaenid ''Papuina''. However, ''Polymita'', ''Liguus'' and ''Amphidromus'' are particularly noted for their color variations. The basic ground color of ''Amphidromus'' appears to be yellow, and this color is usually (except for ''Amphidromus entobaptus'') confined to the surface layers of the shell, since worn specimens appear to be nearly devoid of color. In some species the background color is whitish, and a few have dark background colors. The apex (mollusc), apical whorls are pale, purple, brown, or black, and this sometimes varies within a population (as in ''A. quadrasi''). A few species, for example ''Amphidromus schomburgki, A. schomburgki'', have a deciduous green periostracum.
Continuous zonal patterns can take the form of whitish subsuture (gastropod), sutural bands (''A. similis''), heavy subperipheral pigmentation (''Amphidromus perversus, A. perversus'' var. ''infraviridis''), subsutural color lines (''A. columellaris''), broad spiral color bands (''A. metabletus'', ''A. webbi''), or narrow spiral bands (''Amphidromus laevus, A. laevus''). Interrupted zonation can consist of the interruption of bands into spots in (''A. maculatus''); highly irregular splitting of zones (''A. perversus'' vars. ''sultanus'' and ''interruptus''); formation of oblique radial streaks which run parallel to (in ''Amphidromus inversus, A. inversus'') or cross (in ''A. latestrigatus'') the incremental growth lines; or almost every conceivable combination and variation of these factors. Often the pattern will change radically from the apex (mollusc), apex to the body whorl (in ''A. quadrasi'' vars.). The aperture, parietal callus, columella (gastropod), columella, lip, and umbilical region are variously marked with pink, brown, purple, white, or black. Haniel (1921) includes several color plates which clearly demonstrate the extent of color variation within two species of the ''Syndromus'' type. ''A. perversus'' and ''Amphidromus maculiferus, A. maculiferus'' of the subgenus ''Amphidromus'' are equally variable, whereas species such as ''A. inversus'' and ''A. similis'' are almost uniform in coloration.
In shells of most of the species in the subgenus ''Amphidromus'', resting stages are marked by the deposition of a brown or black radial band called a varix (mollusc), varix. This appears to be rare in the subgenus ''Syndromus'', although the shell of ''A. laevus'' does show evidence of interruption of the spiral banding after a resting phase.
Species recognition
Species recognition is based on combinations of minor structural variations in the shape, aperture, whorl contour, umbilical region, and color pattern. It appears to be the case that many species have a stable color pattern, while other species seem to vary tremendously. Adequate unselected field samples will enable a better understanding of the relative stability or variability of particular species in single localities.Anatomy
Information concerning the soft anatomy of ''Amphidromus'' is widely scattered and fragmentary. The most complete account is that of Arnold Jacobi (1895) on specimens from Natuna Besar, Great Natuna (Natuna Islands) and Djemadja (Anamba Islands). Unfortunately, although it is clear that anatomical differences exist in the two species Jacobi dissected, unfortunately we do not know which forms he worked on, because he had incorrectly identified his material. In his paper he referred to the two species as ''Amphidromus chloris'' and the ''interruptus'' phase of ''A. perversus''. However, that is not possible, because in reality ''Amphidromus chloris'' is a species found only in the Philippine Islands, and the ''interruptus'' phase of ''A. perversus'' is not present in the Natuna Islands. Carl Arend Friedrich Wiegmann (1893, 1898) discussed portions of the anatomy of ''Amphidromus adamsii, A. adamsii'', ''Amphidromus porcellanus, A. porcellanus'', ''Amphidromus contrarius, A. contrarius'', and ''Amphidromus sinistralis, A. sinistralis''. Walter Edward Collinge (1901, 1902) briefly noted features of ''Amphidromus palaceus, A. palaceus'' and ''Amphidromus perakensis, A. parakensis'' (reported as ''A. perversus''). Haniel (1921) dissected ''A. contrarius'' and ''Amphidromus reflexilabris, A. reflexilabris'', and Bernhard Rensch published a few scattered notes in his various faunistic surveys. A few earlier notes are mentioned in Pilsbry (1900). Characters such as the long, narrow kidney with reflexed ureter and closed secondary ureter, the penial complex with distinct penis, which is continuous with the epiphallus, epiphallic caecum (a flagellum and an appendix), unbranched gametolytic duct, lack of vaginal accessory organs, and the basic condition of the nervous and retractor muscle systems support the inclusion of ''Amphidromus'' in the family Camaenidae. This group of snails occur in a wide variety of habitats in the tropics of Eastern Asia and Australasia, and is one of the most diverse families in the clade Stylommatophora. Though Frank Fortescue Laidlaw, Laidlaw & Alan Solem, Solem (1961) provided no more additional details on the anatomy of ''Amphidromus'', subsequent studies by distinct authors, e.g., Bishop (1977) and Solem (1983), have demonstrated that the reproductive system can provide valuable data for species recognition.Diversity and phylogeny
Internet Archive
/ref>Chan S.-Y. & Tan S.-K. (2008). "On a new species of ''Amphidromus'' (''Syndromus'') (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Camaenidae) from Sumba Island, Indonesia". ''Occasional Molluscan Papers'' 1: 6–10
Internet Archive
/ref> Species within the genus ''Amphidromus'' are divided into two subgenera, as in the following list: * Subgenus ''Amphidromus'' Albers, 1850 Originally described as ''Helix perversus'' by Carl Linnaeus, Linnaeus in 10th edition of Systema Naturae, 1758, ''Amphidromus perversus'' is the type species of the genus ''Amphidromus'', by the subsequent designation of Eduard von Martens (1860). Species in the subgenus ''Amphidromus'' are amphidromine (left-handed and right-handed snails occur within the population) with a few exceptions. Four dextral taxa are: ''Amphidromus givenchyi, A. givenchyi'', ''Amphidromus protania, A. protania'', ''Amphidromus schomburgki, A. schomburgki dextrochlorus'' and ''A. inversus annamiticus''; and one sinistral: ''Amphidromus atricallosus, A. atricallosus classiaris''. These species usually have shells which have ht following characteristics: they are large (height often exceeding ); they have a height/width ratio of less than 1.85; and a shell color which is yellowish or greenish. Anatomically they have a long epiphallus and flagellum, and an appendix is usually present. * Subgenus ''Syndromus'' Pilsbry, 1900 All but two species within the subgenus ''Syndromus'' are sinistral. The exceptions are the amphidromine ''Amphidromus glaucolarynx, A. glaucolarynx'' and the dextral ''Amphidromus kruehni, A. kruehni''. The type species of the subgenus ''Syndromus'' is ''Amphidromus contrarius, A. contrarius'' Müller, 1774, by the subsequent designation of Adolf Michael Zilch (1960). Species in the subgenus ''Syndromus'' have smaller shells (height usually less than and height/width ratio greater than 1.85), with variable color pattern. They also have a short epiphallus and flagellum, lacking an appendix. A third possible subgenus, ''Goniodromus'' Bülow, 1905 (type species ''Amphidromus büllowi'' Fruhstorfer, 1905), is also cited in the literature, though its subgeneric status is yet to be confirmed. ;Phylogeny Molecular analyses of partial sequences of 16S rDNA of 18 distinct species carried out by Sutcharit and colleagues (2007) indicate that ''Amphidromus'' is a monophyletic group. In their study, different cladograms obtained through distinct methods such as maximum parsimony, neighbor joining and maximum likelihood were congruent among themselves. Though the cladogram, topology obtained for the subgenus ''Amphidromus'' was fairly consistent with current taxonomy, the phylogeny of sinistral ''Syndromus'' species showed no such correspondence. Also according to their results, enantiomorphy seems to be the plesiomorphy, ancestral state of shell coiling in the genus ''Amphidromus'', which is contrary to the general expectation of dextrally coiled shells as an ancestral condition. Despite being morphologically identical, some specimens supposedly belonging to three species, namely ''Amphidromus semitessellatus'', ''A. xiengensis'' and ''A. areolatus'', apparently had polyphyletic origins of mtDNA haplotypes. This resulted in the same species simultaneously appearing in distinct clades along the topology: for instance, ''A. areolatus'' can be found in two different clades in Sutcharit and colleague's (2007) cladogram, clustered respectively with ''A. xiengiensis'' and also with ''A. semitesselatus''. According to the authors, these results could be explained by convergent evolution, convergent and polymorphism (biology), polymorphic shell color patterns (e.g., the shells of the specimens had very similar colors and shape, though the mtDNA markers showed significant differences). Alternatively, they could also be the result of introgressive hybridization or ancestral polymorphism of mtDNA. In any case, analyses of phylogeography using other markers (Marker gene, nuclear markers or other mtDNA markers) or additional morphological characters would still be necessary to further clarify these issues.
Fossil history
Currently, no reliable pre-human fossil occurrences of ''Amphidromus'' have been recorded. Tera van Benthem Jutting (1932) reported finding several specimens of ''Amphidromus filozonatus, A. filozonatus'' which had been eaten in prehistoric times by natives, in Sampoeng Cave, central Java; and a few years later (van Benthem Jutting, 1937, pp. 92–94) the same author reported a single specimen of ''Amphidromus palaceus, A. palaceus'' from the Trinil Beds of Java. Neither record predates human occupancy, and therefore these shed no light on the pre-human history of ''Amphidromus''.Ecology
Distribution
The genus ''Amphidromus'' ranges from eastern India, in south-western Asia (limited to the north by the Himalayas), to northern Australia (limited eastward by Weber's Line). ''Amphidromus'' species are found in localities as follows: from the Garo Hills and Khasi Hills of Meghalaya in northeastern List of non-marine molluscs of India, India; throughout Burma, Malay Peninsula, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Indonesia as far east as the Sulawesi, Banda Islands, Timor and the Tenimber Islands (but not on Ceram, Buru, Halmahera, Batjan Island, the Obi Islands, the Aru and Kei Islands or the Talaud Archipelago and some Celebesian satellite islands); in the southern Philippines, notably Mindanao and the Balabac, Palawan; and in northern Australia (solely represented by ''Amphidromus cognatus'').Habitat and feeding habits
''Amphidromus'' species are arboreal land snails. Further information concerning the habits and mode of life of the species of ''Amphidromus'' is almost non-existent, however, these snails have generally been collected while they were crawling on trees or shrubs. The diet of ''Amphidromus'' is unknown, but ''Amphidromus atricallosus perakensis'' is thought to feed on microscopic fungi, lichens or terrestrial algae.Lok A. F. S. L. & Tan S. K. (2008). "A review of the Singapore status of the green tree snail, ''Amphidromus atricallosus perakensis'' Fulton, 1901 and its biology". ''Nature in Singapore'1
225–230
/ref>
Life cycle
Despite the great diversity within this genus, as of 2017, comprehensive life-history studies of ''Amphidromus'' species are still lacking; only a few observations of behavior of species within the genus exist, and these observations are scattered throughout the literature. A study by Eugen Paravicini (1921) described egg-laying behaviour in ''Amphidromus palaceus'' var. ''pura'' at Palimanan, West Java. According to Paravicini's observations, in October, 1920, locals from West Java brought in two "nests" containing snails that had just begun depositing their eggs; one snail had folded the exterior leaves of a young bamboo shoot and gummed them together into a pointed cornet. The shoot hung vertically with the narrow end pointed upward, and the wide opening below. The upper part of the sack was filled with eggs when collected. The snail descended slowly, rotating around its longitudinal axis, and deposited eggs until the entire cavity was filled up. If a crack in the basket exposed eggs to the air, they quickly dried up. Two days after capture, egg-laying was finished, and the snail closed the opening by folding over more leaves. Probably four days were spent in egg-laying, since the cavity was half filled at the start of observations. A second nest of similarly folded mango leaves contained 234 eggs. The volume of eggs in each case greatly exceeded the size of the snail, indicating that the eggs must be encapsulated just before deposition. The capsules were very thin, and dried quickly upon any exposure to the air. October marked the start of the rainy season and probably this is the normal breeding period. Eggs of ''A. porcellanus'' were reported by van Benthem Jutting (1950, p. 493) to have started hatching only ten days after being laid. Similar nest-building habits have been reported for other species, but no complete study of a life cycle has been published. Up until 1961, no information was available on the cycle of activity, longevity, rate of growth, etc. Schilthuizen et al. (2005) described the Spatial ecology, spatial structure of a population of ''A. inversus'' in Malaysia. Schilthuizen et al. (2007) found that there is sexual selection in mating with snails of the opposite chirality. This means that the left-handed snails mate more often with right-handed snails than they do with snails of the same coiling. Additionally there are anatomical adaptations of the spermatophore and of the female part of the reproductive system of gastropods, reproductive system for the success of these matings.Predators
Predators of ''Amphidromus'' snails include the red-crowned barbet ''Megalaima rafflesii'',Wee J. (2006). "Red-crowned barbet feeding on snail". http://besgroup.talfrynature.com/2006/06/01/red-crowned-barbet-feeding-on-a-snail/ . Accessed 9 May 2010. and probably other bird species. Asian snakes in the genus ''Pareas'' are known to feed on ''Amphidromus'' species by removing the soft parts from the shells. Many shells of ''Amphidromus'' were found in the den of a rat in Malaysia.See also
* Asymmetry * Chirality (mathematics) * Symmetry in biologyReferences
This article incorporates public domain text from the reference. Frank Fortescue Laidlaw, Laidlaw F. F. & Alan Solem, Solem A. (1961)"The land snail genus ''Amphidromus'': a synoptic catalogue"
''Fieldiana Zoology'' 41(4): 505–720.
Further reading
* * * Dumrongrojwattana P., Mutchacheep S. & Senapin R. (2006). "Identification of 7 Thai arboreal snails genus ''Amphidromus'' Alber, 1850 by using morphometrics technique (Pulmonata: Camaenidae)". ''The Proceeding of 44th Kasetsart University Annual Conference, 30 Jan – 2 Feb 2006, Subject Science'': 7 pp. Kasetsart University, Bangkok. * * * * *External links
{{Taxonbar, from=Q3977888 Amphidromus, Taxonomy articles created by Polbot