''Adkins v. Children's Hospital'', 261 U.S. 525 (1923), is a
United States Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that involve a point o ...
opinion that federal
minimum wage legislation for women was an unconstitutional infringement of liberty of contract, as protected by the
due process clause of the
Fifth Amendment.
''Adkins'' was overturned in ''
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
''West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish'', 300 U.S. 379 (1937), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of state minimum wage legislation. The court's decision overturned an earlier holding in ''Adkins v. Child ...
''.
[.]
Facts
In 1918, Congress passed a law to set minimum wages for women and children in the
District of Columbia
)
, image_skyline =
, image_caption = Clockwise from top left: the Washington Monument and Lincoln Memorial on the National Mall, United States Capitol, Logan Circle, Jefferson Memorial, White House, Adams Morgan, ...
. As in other cases, the question was one of balancing the police power of Congress to regulate working and living conditions with the right of individuals to conduct their own affairs without legislative interference. Children's Hospital and a female elevator operator at a hotel brought the case to prevent enforcement of the act by Jesse C. Adkins and the two other members of a wage board.
Judgement
The Court's decision, by Justice
Sutherland, was that previous decisions (''
Muller v. Oregon'', 208 U.S. 412 (1908) and ''
Bunting v. Oregon'', 243 U.S. 426 (1917)) did not overrule the holding in ''
Lochner v. New York'', 198 U.S. 45 (1905), which protected
freedom of contract. The previous decisions, he noted, addressed maximum hours. The present case addressed a minimum wage. The maximum-hour laws left the parties free to negotiate about wages, unlike the present law, which restricted the employer's side of the negotiation. The Court argued that if legislatures were permitted to set minimum wage laws, they would be permitted to set maximum wage laws. Sutherland asserted:
Sutherland cited the changes that had occurred in the years since ''Muller'', particularly the
Nineteenth Amendment, which guaranteed the right to vote for women. He notes that ''Muller'' and other cases had emphasized differences between men and women as justifying special protection for women, but "
nview of the great—not to say revolutionary—changes which have taken place since
'Muller'' in the contractual, political, and civil status of women, culminating in the Nineteenth Amendment, it is not unreasonable to say that these differences have now come almost, if not quite, to the vanishing point."
Dissents
Taft
Chief Justice Taft, dissenting, argued that there was no distinction between minimum wage laws and maximum hour laws since both were essentially restrictions on contract. He noted that ''Lochner''s limitations seemed to have been overruled in ''Muller'' and ''Bunting''.
Holmes
Justice
Holmes
Holmes may refer to:
Name
* Holmes (surname)
* Holmes (given name)
* Baron Holmes, noble title created twice in the Peerage of Ireland
* Chris Holmes, Baron Holmes of Richmond (born 1971), British former swimmer and life peer
Places
In the Uni ...
, also dissenting, noted that there were many other constraints on contract (such as
blue laws
Blue laws, also known as Sunday laws, Sunday trade laws and Sunday closing laws, are laws restricting or banning certain activities on specified days, usually Sundays in the western world. The laws were adopted originally for religious reasons, ...
and
usury
Usury () is the practice of making unethical or immoral monetary loans that unfairly enrich the lender. The term may be used in a moral sense—condemning taking advantage of others' misfortunes—or in a legal sense, where an interest rate is c ...
laws). He cited the standard that he had put forth in ''Lochner'': if a reasonable person could see a power in the Constitution, the Court should defer to legislation that used such a power.
References
Sources
*Bernstein, David E. Rehabilitating Lochner: Defending Individual Rights against Progressive Reform. Chapter 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
*
*
*
External links
*
*
{{US5thAmendment, dueprocess
United States Supreme Court cases of the Taft Court
United States labor case law
United States substantive due process case law
1923 in United States case law
Minimum wage law
Overruled United States Supreme Court decisions
1923 in women's history
United States Supreme Court cases