Theory
The acoustic-suspension woofer uses the elastic cushion of air within a sealed enclosure to provide the restoring force for the woofer diaphragm. The cushion of air acts like a compression spring. Because the air in the cabinet serves to control the woofer's excursion, the physical stiffness of the driver can be reduced. Unlike the stiff physical suspension built into the driver of conventional speakers, the trapped air inside the sealed-loudspeaker enclosure provides a more linear restoring force for the woofer's diaphragm, enabling it to oscillate a greater distance (excursion) in a linear fashion. This is a requirement for low distortion and loud reproduction of deep bass by drivers with relatively small cones. Even though acoustic suspension cabinets are often called "sealed box" designs, they are not entirely airtight. A small amount of airflow must be allowed so that the speaker can adjust to changes in atmospheric pressure. A semi-porous cone surround allows enough air movement for this purpose. MostAcoustic performance
The two most common types of speaker enclosure are acoustic suspension (sometimes called pneumatic suspension) and bass reflex, so they are worth comparing. In both cases, the tuning affects the lower end of the driver's response, but above a certain frequency, the driver itself becomes the dominant factor and the size of the enclosure and ports (if any) become irrelevant. In general, acoustic suspension systems (driver plus enclosure) have a second-order acoustic (12 dB/octave) roll-off below the −3 dB point. Bass reflex designs have a fourth-order acoustic roll-off (24 dB/octave). Given a driver that is suitable for either type of enclosure, the ideal bass reflex cabinet will be larger, have a lower −3 dB point, but both systems will have equal voltage sensitivity in the passband. On the right is a simulation of the low-frequency response of a typical 5" mid-woofer, the FaitalPRO 5FE120 mid-woofer generated, obtained using WinISD, for ideal sealed (yellow) and ported (cyan) enclosure configurations. The ported version adds about an octave of bass extension, dropping the −3 dB point from 100 Hz to 50 Hz, but the tradeoff is that the cabinet size is more than twice as large, 8 litres of interior space versus 3.8 litres. It is also worth noting that: a) above 200 Hz the simulations converge and there is no difference in output, and b) below 32 Hz the sealed enclosure produces more low-frequency output. Thus, a ported cabinet does not provide improved bass output over the entire low-frequency range. Small presented the physical efficiency-bandwidth-volume limitation of closed-box system design. By considering the variation in the reference efficiency of the driver operating in the system enclosure, the relationship of maximum reference efficiency to cut-off frequency and enclosure volume for closed-box loudspeaker systems was determined. Subsequently, Small derived a similar relationship for vented-box loudspeaker systems. When Small compared these two sets of results, they revealed that the closed-box system has a maximum theoretical value of reference efficiency that is 2.9 dB lower than that of the vented-box system. This suggests that an acoustic suspension loudspeaker with the same enclosure volume and low-frequency −3 dB cut-off as a vented-box system will be up to 2.9 dB less sensitive than its counterpart. Alternatively, if the reference efficiency and cut-off frequency of the two systems is the same, then the enclosure volume of the acoustic suspension loudspeaker will be approximately twice as large as that of the vented system. The acoustic roll-off of acoustic suspension designs makes them easier to integrate with other drivers with a crossover (passive or active). This makes it an ideal choice for midrange enclosures as well as for satellite speaker and subwoofer systems .In multi-way speakers
While boxed hi-fi speakers are often described as being acoustic suspension or ported (bass reflex), depending on the absence or presence of a port tube/vent, it is also true that, in typical box speakers with more than two drivers, the midrange drivers between the woofer and tweeter are usually designed as acoustic suspension, with a separate, sealed air-space, even if the woofer itself is not. However, one notable exception to this was the Sonus Faber Stradivari Homage, which used a ported enclosure for the midrange.See also
*References
{{Reflist, refs= {{cite web , title=Edgar Villchur and the Acoustic Suspension Loudspeaker , url=https://www.aes-media.org/historical/html/recording.technology.history/villchur.html , last=Schoenherr , first=Steven E. , date=2008 , publisher=Audio Engineering Society , access-date=2022-05-14 {{cite journal , title=Revolutionary Loudspeaker and Enclosure , last=Villchur , first=Edgar M. , year=1954 , issue=October , journal=Audio , pages=25–27, 100 , url=https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Audio/Archive-Audio/50s/Audio-1954-Oct.pdf , access-date=2022-05-14 {{cite journal , title=Another Look at Acoustic Suspension , last=Villchur , first=Edgar M. , year=1960 , issue=January , journal=Audio , pages=24–25, 75 , url=https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Audio/Archive-Audio/60s/Audio-1960-Jan.pdf , access-date=2022-05-14 {{cite journal , last=Atkinson , first=John , title=Sonus Faber Stradivari Homage Loudspeaker Measurements , journal=Stereophile , url=https://www.stereophile.com/content/sonus-faber-stradivari-homage-loudspeaker-measurements , date=2005 , issue=January , access-date=2022-05-14 {{cite web , title=FaitalPRO 5FE120 (8Ω) , url=http://www.faitalpro.com/en/products/LF_Loudspeakers/product_details/index.php?id=401010110 , access-date=2022-05-14 {{cite web , title=WinISD Loudspeaker Simulation Software , publisher=Linearteam , url=http://www.linearteam.org/ , access-date=2022-05-14 {{cite journal , last=Small , first=R. H. , title=Closed-Box Loudspeaker Systems–Part 1: Analysis , journal=Journal of the Audio Engineering Society , volume=20 , pages=363–372 , issue=June , year=1972 , url=http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=1967 {{cite journal , last=Small , first=R. H. , title=Closed-Box Loudspeaker Systems–Part 2: Synthesis , journal=Journal of the Audio Engineering Society , volume=21 , pages=11–18 , issue=February , year=1973 , url=http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=2011 {{cite journal , last=Small , first=R. H. , title=Vented-Box Loudspeaker Systems–Part 1: Small-Signal Analysis , journal=Journal of the Audio Engineering Society , volume=21 , issue=June , year=1973 , pages=363–372 , url=http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=1967 {{cite journal , last=Small , first=R. H. , title=Vented-Box Loudspeaker Systems–Part 2: Large-Signal Analysis , journal=Journal of the Audio Engineering Society , volume=21 , issue=July/August , year=1973 , pages=438–444 , url=http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=1959 {{cite journal , last=Thiele , first=A. N. , title=Loudspeakers in Vented Boxes: Part 2 , journal=Journal of the Audio Engineering Society , volume=19 , pages=471–483 , issue=June , year=1971 , url=http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=2163 Acoustics Loudspeaker technology