|
NEXP
In computational complexity theory, the complexity class NEXPTIME (sometimes called NEXP) is the set of decision problems that can be solved by a non-deterministic Turing machine using time 2^. In terms of NTIME, :\mathsf = \bigcup_ \mathsf(2^) Alternatively, NEXPTIME can be defined using deterministic Turing machines as verifiers. A language ''L'' is in NEXPTIME if and only if there exist polynomials ''p'' and ''q'', and a deterministic Turing machine ''M'', such that * For all ''x'' and ''y'', the machine ''M'' runs in time 2^ on input * For all ''x'' in ''L'', there exists a string ''y'' of length 2^ such that * For all ''x'' not in ''L'' and all strings ''y'' of length 2^, We know : and also, by the time hierarchy theorem, that : If , then (padding argument); more precisely, if and only if there exist sparse languages in NP that are not in P. Alternative characterizations NEXPTIME often arises in the context of interactive proof systems, where there are two major ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Complexity Class
In computational complexity theory, a complexity class is a set of computational problems of related resource-based complexity. The two most commonly analyzed resources are time and memory. In general, a complexity class is defined in terms of a type of computational problem, a model of computation, and a bounded resource like time or memory. In particular, most complexity classes consist of decision problems that are solvable with a Turing machine, and are differentiated by their time or space (memory) requirements. For instance, the class P is the set of decision problems solvable by a deterministic Turing machine in polynomial time. There are, however, many complexity classes defined in terms of other types of problems (e.g. counting problems and function problems) and using other models of computation (e.g. probabilistic Turing machines, interactive proof systems, Boolean circuits, and quantum computers). The study of the relationships between complexity classes is a ma ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
EXPTIME
In computational complexity theory, the complexity class EXPTIME (sometimes called EXP or DEXPTIME) is the set of all decision problems that are solvable by a deterministic Turing machine in exponential time, i.e., in O(2''p''(''n'')) time, where ''p''(''n'') is a polynomial function of ''n''. EXPTIME is one intuitive class in an exponential hierarchy of complexity classes with increasingly more complex oracles or quantifier alternations. For example, the class 2-EXPTIME is defined similarly to EXPTIME but with a doubly exponential time bound. This can be generalized to higher and higher time bounds. EXPTIME can also be reformulated as the space class APSPACE, the set of all problems that can be solved by an alternating Turing machine in polynomial space. EXPTIME relates to the other basic time and space complexity classes in the following way: P ⊆ NP ⊆ PSPACE ⊆ EXPTIME ⊆ NEXPTIME ⊆ EXPSPACE. Furthemore, by the time hierarchy theorem and the space hierarchy the ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Probabilistically Checkable Proof
In computational complexity theory, a probabilistically checkable proof (PCP) is a type of proof that can be checked by a randomized algorithm using a bounded amount of randomness and reading a bounded number of bits of the proof. The algorithm is then required to accept correct proofs and reject incorrect proofs with very high probability. A standard proof (or certificate), as used in the verifier-based definition of the complexity class NP, also satisfies these requirements, since the checking procedure deterministically reads the whole proof, always accepts correct proofs and rejects incorrect proofs. However, what makes them interesting is the existence of probabilistically checkable proofs that can be checked by reading only a few bits of the proof using randomness in an essential way. Probabilistically checkable proofs give rise to many complexity classes depending on the number of queries required and the amount of randomness used. The class PCP 'r''(''n''),''q''(''n'')r ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Padding Argument
In computational complexity theory, the padding argument is a tool to conditionally prove that if some complexity classes are equal, then some other bigger classes are also equal. Example The proof that P = NP implies EXP = NEXP uses "padding". \mathrm \subseteq \mathrm by definition, so it suffices to show \mathrm \subseteq \mathrm. Let ''L'' be a language in NEXP. Since ''L'' is in NEXP, there is a non-deterministic Turing machine ''M'' that decides ''L'' in time 2^ for some constant ''c''. Let : L'=\, where '1' is a symbol not occurring in ''L''. First we show that L' is in NP, then we will use the deterministic polynomial time machine given by P = NP to show that ''L'' is in EXP. L' can be decided in non-deterministic polynomial time as follows. Given input x', verify that it has the form x' = x1^ and reject if it does not. If it has the correct form, simulate ''M''(''x''). The simulation takes non-deterministic 2^ time, which is ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Computational Complexity Theory
In theoretical computer science and mathematics, computational complexity theory focuses on classifying computational problems according to their resource usage, and relating these classes to each other. A computational problem is a task solved by a computer. A computation problem is solvable by mechanical application of mathematical steps, such as an algorithm. A problem is regarded as inherently difficult if its solution requires significant resources, whatever the algorithm used. The theory formalizes this intuition, by introducing mathematical models of computation to study these problems and quantifying their computational complexity, i.e., the amount of resources needed to solve them, such as time and storage. Other measures of complexity are also used, such as the amount of communication (used in communication complexity), the number of gates in a circuit (used in circuit complexity) and the number of processors (used in parallel computing). One of the roles of computationa ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Time Hierarchy Theorem
In computational complexity theory, the time hierarchy theorems are important statements about time-bounded computation on Turing machines. Informally, these theorems say that given more time, a Turing machine can solve more problems. For example, there are problems that can be solved with ''n''2 time but not ''n'' time. The time hierarchy theorem for deterministic multi-tape Turing machines was first proven by Richard E. Stearns and Juris Hartmanis in 1965. It was improved a year later when F. C. Hennie and Richard E. Stearns improved the efficiency of the Universal Turing machine. Consequent to the theorem, for every deterministic time-bounded complexity class, there is a strictly larger time-bounded complexity class, and so the time-bounded hierarchy of complexity classes does not completely collapse. More precisely, the time hierarchy theorem for deterministic Turing machines states that for all time-constructible functions ''f''(''n''), :\mathsf\left(o\left(\frac\right)\righ ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Interactive Proof System
In computational complexity theory, an interactive proof system is an abstract machine that models computation as the exchange of messages between two parties: a ''prover'' and a ''verifier''. The parties interact by exchanging messages in order to ascertain whether a given string belongs to a language or not. The prover possesses unlimited computational resources but cannot be trusted, while the verifier has bounded computation power but is assumed to be always honest. Messages are sent between the verifier and prover until the verifier has an answer to the problem and has "convinced" itself that it is correct. All interactive proof systems have two requirements: * Completeness: if the statement is true, the honest prover (that is, one following the protocol properly) can convince the honest verifier that it is indeed true. * Soundness: if the statement is false, no prover, even if it doesn't follow the protocol, can convince the honest verifier that it is true, except with some ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
NTIME
In computational complexity theory, the complexity class NTIME(''f''(''n'')) is the set of decision problems that can be solved by a non-deterministic Turing machine which runs in time ''O''(''f''(''n'')). Here ''O'' is the big O notation, ''f'' is some function, and ''n'' is the size of the input (for which the problem is to be decided). Meaning This means that there is a non-deterministic machine which, for a given input of size ''n'', will run in time ''O''(''f''(''n'')) (i.e. within a constant multiple of ''f''(''n''), for ''n'' greater than some value), and will always "reject" the input if the answer to the decision problem is "no" for that input, while if the answer is "yes" the machine will "accept" that input for at least one computation path. Equivalently, there is a deterministic Turing machine ''M'' that runs in time ''O''(''f''(''n'')) and is able to check an ''O''(''f''(''n''))-length certificate for an input; if the input is a "yes" instance, then at least one certifi ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
NP (complexity)
In computational complexity theory, NP (nondeterministic polynomial time) is a complexity class used to classify decision problems. NP is the set of decision problems for which the problem instances, where the answer is "yes", have proofs verifiable in polynomial time by a deterministic Turing machine, or alternatively the set of problems that can be solved in polynomial time by a nondeterministic Turing machine.''Polynomial time'' refers to how quickly the number of operations needed by an algorithm, relative to the size of the problem, grows. It is therefore a measure of efficiency of an algorithm. An equivalent definition of NP is the set of decision problems ''solvable'' in polynomial time by a nondeterministic Turing machine. This definition is the basis for the abbreviation NP; " nondeterministic, polynomial time". These two definitions are equivalent because the algorithm based on the Turing machine consists of two phases, the first of which consists of a guess abou ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
NE (complexity)
In computational complexity theory, the complexity class NE is the set of decision problems that can be solved by a non-deterministic Turing machine in time O(''k''n) for some ''k''. NE, unlike the similar class NEXPTIME, is not closed under polynomial-time many-one reductions. See also * E (complexity) In computational complexity theory, the complexity class E is the set of decision problems that can be solved by a deterministic Turing machine in time 2 O(''n'') and is therefore equal to the complexity class DTIME(2O(''n'')). E, unlike the simil .... References {{DEFAULTSORT:Ne (Complexity) Complexity classes ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Sparse Language
In computational complexity theory, a sparse language is a formal language (a set of strings) such that the complexity function, counting the number of strings of length ''n'' in the language, is bounded by a polynomial function of ''n''. They are used primarily in the study of the relationship of the complexity class NP with other classes. The complexity class of all sparse languages is called SPARSE. Sparse languages are called ''sparse'' because there are a total of 2''n'' strings of length ''n'', and if a language only contains polynomially many of these, then the proportion of strings of length ''n'' that it contains rapidly goes to zero as ''n'' grows. All unary languages are sparse. An example of a nontrivial sparse language is the set of binary strings containing exactly ''k'' 1 bits for some fixed ''k''; for each ''n'', there are only \binom strings in the language, which is bounded by ''n''''k''. Relationships to other complexity classes SPARSE contains TALLY, the cl ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Adjacency Matrix
In graph theory and computer science, an adjacency matrix is a square matrix used to represent a finite graph. The elements of the matrix indicate whether pairs of vertices are adjacent or not in the graph. In the special case of a finite simple graph, the adjacency matrix is a (0,1)-matrix with zeros on its diagonal. If the graph is undirected (i.e. all of its edges are bidirectional), the adjacency matrix is symmetric. The relationship between a graph and the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of its adjacency matrix is studied in spectral graph theory. The adjacency matrix of a graph should be distinguished from its incidence matrix, a different matrix representation whose elements indicate whether vertex–edge pairs are incident or not, and its degree matrix, which contains information about the degree of each vertex. Definition For a simple graph with vertex set , the adjacency matrix is a square matrix such that its element is one when there is an edge from vertex to ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
.svg "Click for more on -> Interactive Proof System")
