|
Matching In Hypergraphs
In graph theory, a matching in a hypergraph is a set of hyperedges, in which every two hyperedges are disjoint. It is an extension of the notion of matching in a graph. Definition Recall that a hypergraph is a pair , where is a set of vertices and is a set of subsets of called ''hyperedges''. Each hyperedge may contain one or more vertices. A matching in is a subset of , such that every two hyperedges and in have an empty intersection (have no vertex in common). The matching number of a hypergraph is the largest size of a matching in . It is often denoted by . As an example, let be the set Consider a 3-uniform hypergraph on (a hypergraph in which each hyperedge contains exactly 3 vertices). Let be a 3-uniform hypergraph with 4 hyperedges: : Then admits several matchings of size 2, for example: : : However, in any subset of 3 hyperedges, at least two of them intersect, so there is no matching of size 3. Hence, the matching number of is 2. Intersec ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Graph Theory
In mathematics, graph theory is the study of ''graphs'', which are mathematical structures used to model pairwise relations between objects. A graph in this context is made up of '' vertices'' (also called ''nodes'' or ''points'') which are connected by '' edges'' (also called ''links'' or ''lines''). A distinction is made between undirected graphs, where edges link two vertices symmetrically, and directed graphs, where edges link two vertices asymmetrically. Graphs are one of the principal objects of study in discrete mathematics. Definitions Definitions in graph theory vary. The following are some of the more basic ways of defining graphs and related mathematical structures. Graph In one restricted but very common sense of the term, a graph is an ordered pair G=(V,E) comprising: * V, a set of vertices (also called nodes or points); * E \subseteq \, a set of edges (also called links or lines), which are unordered pairs of vertices (that is, an edge is associated with t ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Perfect Matching In High-degree Hypergraphs
In graph theory, perfect matching in high-degree hypergraphs is a research avenue trying to find sufficient conditions for existence of a perfect matching in a hypergraph, based only on the degree of vertices or subsets of them. Introduction Degrees and matchings in graphs In a simple graph , the degree of a vertex , often denoted by or , is the number of edges in adjacent to . The minimum degree of a graph, often denoted by or , is the minimum of over all vertices in . A matching in a graph is a set of edges such that each vertex is adjacent to at most one edge; a perfect matching is a matching in which each vertex is adjacent to exactly one edge. A perfect matching does not always exist, and thus it is interesting to find sufficient conditions that guarantee its existence. One such condition follows from Dirac's theorem on Hamiltonian cycles. It says that, if , then the graph admits a Hamiltonian cycle; this implies that it admits a perfect matching. The factor ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Kőnig's Theorem (graph Theory)
In the mathematical area of graph theory, Kőnig's theorem, proved by , describes an equivalence between the maximum matching problem and the minimum vertex cover problem in bipartite graphs. It was discovered independently, also in 1931, by Jenő Egerváry in the more general case of weighted graphs. Setting A vertex cover in a graph is a set of vertices that includes at least one endpoint of every edge, and a vertex cover is ''minimum'' if no other vertex cover has fewer vertices. A matching in a graph is a set of edges no two of which share an endpoint, and a matching is ''maximum'' if no other matching has more edges. It is obvious from the definition that any vertex-cover set must be at least as large as any matching set (since for every edge in the matching, at least one vertex is needed in the cover). In particular, the minimum vertex cover set is at least as large as the maximum matching set. Kőnig's theorem states that, in any bipartite graph, the minimum vertex c ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Ryser's Conjecture
In graph theory, Ryser's conjecture is a conjecture relating the maximum matching size and the minimum transversal size in hypergraphs. This conjecture first appeared in 1971 in the Ph.D. thesis of J. R. Henderson, whose advisor was Herbert John Ryser. Preliminaries A matching in a hypergraph is a set of hyperedges such that each vertex appears in at most one of them. The largest size of a matching in a hypergraph ''H'' is denoted by \nu(H). A transversal (or vertex cover) in a hypergraph is a set of vertices such that each hyperedge contains at least one of them. The smallest size of a transversal in a hypergraph ''H'' is denoted by \tau(H). For every ''H'', \nu(H)\leq \tau(H), since every cover must contain at least one point from each edge in any matching. If H is ''r''-uniform (each hyperedge has exactly ''r'' vertices), then \tau(H) \leq r\cdot \nu(H), since the union of the edges from any maximal matching is a set of at most ''rv'' vertices that meets every edge. T ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Matching In Hypergraphs
In graph theory, a matching in a hypergraph is a set of hyperedges, in which every two hyperedges are disjoint. It is an extension of the notion of matching in a graph. Definition Recall that a hypergraph is a pair , where is a set of vertices and is a set of subsets of called ''hyperedges''. Each hyperedge may contain one or more vertices. A matching in is a subset of , such that every two hyperedges and in have an empty intersection (have no vertex in common). The matching number of a hypergraph is the largest size of a matching in . It is often denoted by . As an example, let be the set Consider a 3-uniform hypergraph on (a hypergraph in which each hyperedge contains exactly 3 vertices). Let be a 3-uniform hypergraph with 4 hyperedges: : Then admits several matchings of size 2, for example: : : However, in any subset of 3 hyperedges, at least two of them intersect, so there is no matching of size 3. Hence, the matching number of is 2. Intersec ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Linear Programming Duality
The dual of a given linear program (LP) is another LP that is derived from the original (the primal) LP in the following schematic way: * Each variable in the primal LP becomes a constraint in the dual LP; * Each constraint in the primal LP becomes a variable in the dual LP; * The objective direction is inversed – maximum in the primal becomes minimum in the dual and vice versa. The weak duality theorem states that the objective value of the dual LP at any feasible solution is always a bound on the objective of the primal LP at any feasible solution (upper or lower bound, depending on whether it is a maximization or minimization problem). In fact, this bounding property holds for the optimal values of the dual and primal LPs. The strong duality theorem states that, moreover, if the primal has an optimal solution then the dual has an optimal solution too, ''and the two optima are equal''. Pages 81–104. These theorems belong to a larger class of duality theorems in optimizatio ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Vertex Cover
In graph theory, a vertex cover (sometimes node cover) of a graph is a set of vertices that includes at least one endpoint of every edge of the graph. In computer science, the problem of finding a minimum vertex cover is a classical optimization problem. It is NP-hard, so it cannot be solved by a polynomial-time algorithm if P ≠ NP. Moreover, it is hard to approximate – it cannot be approximated up to a factor smaller than 2 if the unique games conjecture is true. On the other hand, it has several simple 2-factor approximations. It is a typical example of an NP-hard optimization problem that has an approximation algorithm. Its decision version, the vertex cover problem, was one of Karp's 21 NP-complete problems and is therefore a classical NP-complete problem in computational complexity theory. Furthermore, the vertex cover problem is fixed-parameter tractable and a central problem in parameterized complexity theory. The minimum vertex cover problem can be formulated as ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Set Cover Problem
The set cover problem is a classical question in combinatorics, computer science, operations research, and complexity theory. It is one of Karp's 21 NP-complete problems shown to be NP-complete in 1972. Given a set of elements (called the universe) and a collection of sets whose union equals the universe, the set cover problem is to identify the smallest sub-collection of whose union equals the universe. For example, consider the universe and the collection of sets Clearly the union of is . However, we can cover all of the elements with the following, smaller number of sets: More formally, given a universe \mathcal and a family \mathcal of subsets of \mathcal, a ''cover'' is a subfamily \mathcal\subseteq\mathcal of sets whose union is \mathcal. In the set covering decision problem, the input is a pair (\mathcal,\mathcal) and an integer k; the question is whether there is a set covering of size k or less. In the set covering optimization problem, the input is a pair (\ma ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
