Lévy Hierarchy

	Lévy Hierarchy In set theory and mathematical logic, the Lévy hierarchy, introduced by Azriel Lévy in 1965, is a hierarchy of formulas in the formal language of the Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, which is typically called just the language of set theory. This is analogous to the arithmetical hierarchy, which provides a similar classification for sentences of the language of arithmetic. Definitions In the language of set theory, atomic formulas are of the form x = y or x ∈ y, standing for equality and set membership predicates, respectively. The first level of the Lévy hierarchy is defined as containing only formulas with no unbounded quantifiers, and is denoted by \Delta _0=\Sigma_0=\Pi_0.Walicki, Michal (2012). ''Mathematical Logic'', p. 225. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. The next levels are given by finding an equivalent formula in prenex normal form, and counting the number of changes of quantifiers: In the theory ZFC, a formula A is called: \Sigma _ if A is equivalent ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
picture info	Set Theory Set theory is the branch of mathematical logic that studies sets, which can be informally described as collections of objects. Although objects of any kind can be collected into a set, set theory, as a branch of mathematics, is mostly concerned with those that are relevant to mathematics as a whole. The modern study of set theory was initiated by the German mathematicians Richard Dedekind and Georg Cantor in the 1870s. In particular, Georg Cantor is commonly considered the founder of set theory. The non-formalized systems investigated during this early stage go under the name of '' naive set theory''. After the discovery of paradoxes within naive set theory (such as Russell's paradox, Cantor's paradox and the Burali-Forti paradox) various axiomatic systems were proposed in the early twentieth century, of which Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (with or without the axiom of choice) is still the best-known and most studied. Set theory is commonly employed as a foundational ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
picture info	Cartesian Product In mathematics, specifically set theory, the Cartesian product of two sets ''A'' and ''B'', denoted ''A''×''B'', is the set of all ordered pairs where ''a'' is in ''A'' and ''b'' is in ''B''. In terms of set-builder notation, that is : A\times B = \. A table can be created by taking the Cartesian product of a set of rows and a set of columns. If the Cartesian product is taken, the cells of the table contain ordered pairs of the form . One can similarly define the Cartesian product of ''n'' sets, also known as an ''n''-fold Cartesian product, which can be represented by an ''n''-dimensional array, where each element is an ''n''-tuple. An ordered pair is a 2-tuple or couple. More generally still, one can define the Cartesian product of an indexed family of sets. The Cartesian product is named after René Descartes, whose formulation of analytic geometry gave rise to the concept, which is further generalized in terms of direct product. Examples A deck of cards An ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Continuum Hypothesis In mathematics, the continuum hypothesis (abbreviated CH) is a hypothesis about the possible sizes of infinite sets. It states that or equivalently, that In Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice (ZFC), this is equivalent to the following equation in aleph numbers: 2^=\aleph_1, or even shorter with beth numbers: \beth_1 = \aleph_1. The continuum hypothesis was advanced by Georg Cantor in 1878, and establishing its truth or falsehood is the first of Hilbert's 23 problems presented in 1900. The answer to this problem is independent of ZFC, so that either the continuum hypothesis or its negation can be added as an axiom to ZFC set theory, with the resulting theory being consistent if and only if ZFC is consistent. This independence was proved in 1963 by Paul Cohen, complementing earlier work by Kurt Gödel in 1940. The name of the hypothesis comes from the term '' the continuum'' for the real numbers. History Cantor believed the continuum hypothesis to be ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Supercompact Cardinal In set theory, a supercompact cardinal is a type of large cardinal. They display a variety of reflection properties. Formal definition If ''λ'' is any ordinal, ''κ'' is ''λ''-supercompact means that there exists an elementary embedding ''j'' from the universe ''V'' into a transitive inner model ''M'' with critical point ''κ'', ''j''(''κ'')>''λ'' and :^\lambda M\subseteq M \,. That is, ''M'' contains all of its ''λ''-sequences. Then ''κ'' is supercompact means that it is ''λ''-supercompact for all ordinals ''λ''. Alternatively, an uncountable cardinal ''κ'' is supercompact if for every ''A'' such that , ''A'', ≥ ''κ'' there exists a normal measure over 'A''sup>< ''κ'' with the additional property that every function $\to A$ such that $\ \in U$ is constant on a set in $U$ . Here "constan ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Powerset In mathematics, the power set (or powerset) of a set is the set of all subsets of , including the empty set and itself. In axiomatic set theory (as developed, for example, in the ZFC axioms), the existence of the power set of any set is postulated by the axiom of power set. The powerset of is variously denoted as , , , \mathbb(S), or . The notation , meaning the set of all functions from S to a given set of two elements (e.g., ), is used because the powerset of can be identified with, equivalent to, or bijective to the set of all the functions from to the given two elements set. Any subset of is called a ''family of sets'' over . Example If is the set , then all the subsets of are * (also denoted \varnothing or \empty, the empty set or the null set) * * * * * * * and hence the power set of is . Properties If is a finite set with the cardinality (i.e., the number of all elements in the set is ), then the number of all the subsets of is . This fact as well ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Inaccessible Cardinal In set theory, an uncountable cardinal is inaccessible if it cannot be obtained from smaller cardinals by the usual operations of cardinal arithmetic. More precisely, a cardinal is strongly inaccessible if it is uncountable, it is not a sum of fewer than cardinals smaller than , and \alpha < \kappa implies $2^ < \kappa$ . The term "inaccessible cardinal" is ambiguous. Until about 1950, it meant "weakly inaccessible cardinal", but since then it usually means "strongly inaccessible cardinal". An uncountable cardinal is weakly inaccessible if it is a regular weak limit cardinal. It is strongly inaccessible, or just inaccessible, if it is a regular strong limit cardinal (this is equivalent to the definition given above). Some authors do not require weakly and strongly ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Limit Cardinal In mathematics, limit cardinals are certain cardinal numbers. A cardinal number ''λ'' is a weak limit cardinal if ''λ'' is neither a successor cardinal nor zero. This means that one cannot "reach" ''λ'' from another cardinal by repeated successor operations. These cardinals are sometimes called simply "limit cardinals" when the context is clear. A cardinal ''λ'' is a strong limit cardinal if ''λ'' cannot be reached by repeated powerset operations. This means that ''λ'' is nonzero and, for all ''κ'' < ''λ'', 2^''κ'' < ''λ''. Every strong limit cardinal is also a weak limit cardinal, because ''κ''⁺ ≤ 2^''κ'' for every cardinal ''κ'', where ''κ''⁺ denotes the successor cardinal of ''κ''. The first infinite cardinal, $\aleph_0$ ( aleph-naught ), is a strong limit cardinal, ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Regular Cardinal In set theory, a regular cardinal is a cardinal number that is equal to its own cofinality. More explicitly, this means that \kappa is a regular cardinal if and only if every unbounded subset C \subseteq \kappa has cardinality \kappa. Infinite well-ordered cardinals that are not regular are called singular cardinals. Finite cardinal numbers are typically not called regular or singular. In the presence of the axiom of choice, any cardinal number can be well-ordered, and then the following are equivalent for a cardinal \kappa: # \kappa is a regular cardinal. # If \kappa = \sum_ \lambda_i and \lambda_i < \kappa for all $i$ , then $, I, \ge \kappa$ . # If $S = \bigcup_ S_i$ , and if $, I, < \kappa$ and $, S_i, < \kappa$ for all $i$ , then $, S, < \kappa$ . # The category [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
picture info	Cardinal Number In mathematics, cardinal numbers, or cardinals for short, are a generalization of the natural numbers used to measure the cardinality (size) of sets. The cardinality of a finite set is a natural number: the number of elements in the set. The ''transfinite'' cardinal numbers, often denoted using the Hebrew symbol \aleph ( aleph) followed by a subscript, describe the sizes of infinite sets. Cardinality is defined in terms of bijective functions. Two sets have the same cardinality if, and only if, there is a one-to-one correspondence (bijection) between the elements of the two sets. In the case of finite sets, this agrees with the intuitive notion of size. In the case of infinite sets, the behavior is more complex. A fundamental theorem due to Georg Cantor shows that it is possible for infinite sets to have different cardinalities, and in particular the cardinality of the set of real numbers is greater than the cardinality of the set of natural numbers. It is also possible for ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
picture info	Countable Set In mathematics, a set is countable if either it is finite or it can be made in one to one correspondence with the set of natural numbers. Equivalently, a set is ''countable'' if there exists an injective function from it into the natural numbers; this means that each element in the set may be associated to a unique natural number, or that the elements of the set can be counted one at a time, although the counting may never finish due to an infinite number of elements. In more technical terms, assuming the axiom of countable choice, a set is ''countable'' if its cardinality (its number of elements) is not greater than that of the natural numbers. A countable set that is not finite is said countably infinite. The concept is attributed to Georg Cantor, who proved the existence of uncountable sets, that is, sets that are not countable; for example the set of the real numbers. A note on terminology Although the terms "countable" and "countably infinite" as defined here are quite co ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
picture info	Transitive Closure In mathematics, the transitive closure of a binary relation on a set is the smallest relation on that contains and is transitive. For finite sets, "smallest" can be taken in its usual sense, of having the fewest related pairs; for infinite sets it is the unique minimal transitive superset of . For example, if is a set of airports and means "there is a direct flight from airport to airport " (for and in ), then the transitive closure of on is the relation such that means "it is possible to fly from to in one or more flights". Informally, the ''transitive closure'' gives you the set of all places you can get to from any starting place. More formally, the transitive closure of a binary relation on a set is the transitive relation on set such that contains and is minimal; see . If the binary relation itself is transitive, then the transitive closure is that same binary relation; otherwise, the transitive closure is a different relation. Conversely, transitive ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Jon Barwise Kenneth Jon Barwise (; June 29, 1942 – March 5, 2000) was an American mathematician, philosopher and logician who proposed some fundamental revisions to the way that logic is understood and used. Education and career Born in Independence, Missouri to Kenneth T. and Evelyn Barwise, Jon was a precocious child. A pupil of Solomon Feferman at Stanford University, Barwise started his research in infinitary logic. After positions as assistant professor at Yale University and the University of Wisconsin, during which time his interests turned to natural language, he returned to Stanford in 1983 to direct the Center for the Study of Language and Information. He began teaching at Indiana University in 1990. He was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1999. In his last year, Barwise was invited to give the 2000 Gödel Lecture; he died prior to the lecture. Philosophical and logical work Barwise contended that, by being explicit about the context in whic ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]