|
Kurepa Tree
In set theory, a Kurepa tree is a tree (''T'', <) of height ω1, each of whose levels is at most countable, and has at least ℵ2 many branches. This concept was introduced by . The existence of a Kurepa tree (known as the Kurepa hypothesis, though Kurepa originally conjectured that this was false) is consistent with the axioms of ZFC: Solovay showed in unpublished work that there are Kurepa trees in Gödel's |
Set Theory
Set theory is the branch of mathematical logic that studies sets, which can be informally described as collections of objects. Although objects of any kind can be collected into a set, set theory, as a branch of mathematics, is mostly concerned with those that are relevant to mathematics as a whole. The modern study of set theory was initiated by the German mathematicians Richard Dedekind and Georg Cantor in the 1870s. In particular, Georg Cantor is commonly considered the founder of set theory. The non-formalized systems investigated during this early stage go under the name of '' naive set theory''. After the discovery of paradoxes within naive set theory (such as Russell's paradox, Cantor's paradox and the Burali-Forti paradox) various axiomatic systems were proposed in the early twentieth century, of which Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (with or without the axiom of choice) is still the best-known and most studied. Set theory is commonly employed as a foundational ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
List Of Forcing Notions
In mathematics, forcing (mathematics), forcing is a method of constructing new models ''M''[''G''] of set theory by adding a generic subset ''G'' of a poset ''P'' to a model ''M''. The poset ''P'' used will determine what statements hold in the new universe (the 'extension'); to force a statement of interest thus requires construction of a suitable ''P''. This article lists some of the posets ''P'' that have been used in this construction. Notation *''P'' is a poset with order < *''V'' is the universe of all sets *''M'' is a countable transitive model of set theory *''G'' is a generic subset of ''P'' over ''M''. Definitions *''P'' satisfies the countable chain condition if every antichain in ''P'' is at most countable. This implies that ''V'' and ''V''[''G''] have the same cardinals (and the same cofinalities). *A subset ''D'' of ''P'' is called dense if for every there is some with . *A filter on ''P'' is a nonempty subset ''F'' of ''P'' such that if and th ...[...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Suslin Tree
In mathematics, a Suslin tree is a tree of height ω1 such that every branch and every antichain is at most countable. They are named after Mikhail Yakovlevich Suslin. Every Suslin tree is an Aronszajn tree. The existence of a Suslin tree is independent of ZFC, and is equivalent to the existence of a Suslin line (shown by ) or a Suslin algebra. The diamond principle, a consequence of V=L, implies that there is a Suslin tree, and Martin's axiom MA(ℵ1) implies that there are no Suslin trees. More generally, for any infinite cardinal κ, a κ-Suslin tree is a tree of height κ such that every branch and antichain has cardinality less than κ. In particular a Suslin tree is the same as a ω1-Suslin tree. showed that if V=L then there is a κ-Suslin tree for every infinite successor cardinal κ. Whether the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis implies the existence of an ℵ2-Suslin tree, is a longstanding open problem. See also * Glossary of set theory * Kurepa tree * List of ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Aronszajn Tree
In set theory, an Aronszajn tree is a tree of uncountable height with no uncountable branches and no uncountable levels. For example, every Suslin tree is an Aronszajn tree. More generally, for a cardinal ''κ'', a ''κ''-Aronszajn tree is a tree of height ''κ'' in which all levels have size less than ''κ'' and all branches have height less than ''κ'' (so Aronszajn trees are the same as \aleph_1-Aronszajn trees). They are named for Nachman Aronszajn, who constructed an Aronszajn tree in 1934; his construction was described by . A cardinal ''κ'' for which no ''κ''-Aronszajn trees exist is said to have the tree property (sometimes the condition that ''κ'' is regular and uncountable is included). Existence of κ-Aronszajn trees Kőnig's lemma states that \aleph_0-Aronszajn trees do not exist. The existence of Aronszajn trees (=\aleph_1-Aronszajn trees) was proven by Nachman Aronszajn, and implies that the analogue of Kőnig's lemma does not hold for uncountable trees. Th ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Ordinal Collapsing Function
In mathematical logic and set theory, an ordinal collapsing function (or projection function) is a technique for defining ( notations for) certain recursive large countable ordinals, whose principle is to give names to certain ordinals much larger than the one being defined, perhaps even large cardinals (though they can be replaced with recursively large ordinals at the cost of extra technical difficulty), and then "collapse" them down to a system of notations for the sought-after ordinal. For this reason, ordinal collapsing functions are described as an impredicative manner of naming ordinals. The details of the definition of ordinal collapsing functions vary, and get more complicated as greater ordinals are being defined, but the typical idea is that whenever the notation system "runs out of fuel" and cannot name a certain ordinal, a much larger ordinal is brought "from above" to give a name to that critical point. An example of how this works will be detailed below, for an o ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Forcing (mathematics)
In the mathematical discipline of set theory, forcing is a technique for proving consistency and independence results. It was first used by Paul Cohen in 1963, to prove the independence of the axiom of choice and the continuum hypothesis from Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. Forcing has been considerably reworked and simplified in the following years, and has since served as a powerful technique, both in set theory and in areas of mathematical logic such as recursion theory. Descriptive set theory uses the notions of forcing from both recursion theory and set theory. Forcing has also been used in model theory, but it is common in model theory to define genericity directly without mention of forcing. Intuition Intuitively, forcing consists of expanding the set theoretical universe V to a larger universe V^ . In this bigger universe, for example, one might have many new real numbers, identified with subsets of the set \mathbb of natural numbers, that were not there in the old ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Ineffable Cardinal
In the mathematics of transfinite numbers, an ineffable cardinal is a certain kind of large cardinal number, introduced by . In the following definitions, \kappa will always be a regular uncountable cardinal number. A cardinal number \kappa is called almost ineffable if for every f: \kappa \to \mathcal(\kappa) (where \mathcal(\kappa) is the powerset of \kappa) with the property that f(\delta) is a subset of \delta for all ordinals \delta < \kappa, there is a subset of having cardinality and for , in the sense that for any in , . A |
Jech–Kunen Tree
A Jech–Kunen tree is a set-theoretic tree with properties that are incompatible with the generalized continuum hypothesis. It is named after Thomas Jech and Kenneth Kunen, both of whom studied the possibility and consequences of its existence. Definition A ''ω''1-tree is a tree with cardinality \aleph_1 and height ''ω''1, where ''ω''1 is the first uncountable ordinal and \aleph_1 is the associated cardinal number. A Jech–Kunen tree is a ''ω''1-tree in which the number of branches is greater than \aleph_1 and less than 2^. Existence found the first model in which this tree exists, and showed that, assuming the continuum hypothesis and 2^ > \aleph_2 , the existence of a Jech–Kunen tree is equivalent to the existence of a compact Hausdorff space with weight \aleph_1 and cardinality strictly between \aleph_1 and 2^. References * * *{{citation, last=Jin, first=Renling, title=The differences between Kurepa trees and Jech-Kunen trees, journal=Archive for Mathematical Logic ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Strongly Inaccessible Cardinal
In set theory, an uncountable cardinal is inaccessible if it cannot be obtained from smaller cardinals by the usual operations of cardinal arithmetic. More precisely, a cardinal is strongly inaccessible if it is uncountable, it is not a sum of fewer than cardinals smaller than , and \alpha < \kappa implies . The term "inaccessible cardinal" is ambiguous. Until about 1950, it meant "weakly inaccessible cardinal", but since then it usually means "strongly inaccessible cardinal". An uncountable cardinal is weakly inaccessible if it is a regular . It is strongly inaccessible, or just inaccessible, if it is a regular strong limit cardinal (this is equivalent to the definition given above). Some authors do ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Tree (set Theory)
In set theory, a tree is a partially ordered set (''T'', <) such that for each ''t'' ∈ ''T'', the set is by the relation <. Frequently trees are assumed to have only one root (i.e. ), as the typical questions investigated in this field are easily reduced to questions about single-rooted trees. Definition A tree is a (poset) (''T'', <) such that for each ''t'' ∈ ''T'', the set is by the ...[...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Diamond Principle
In mathematics, and particularly in axiomatic set theory, the diamond principle is a combinatorial principle introduced by Ronald Jensen in that holds in the constructible universe () and that implies the continuum hypothesis. Jensen extracted the diamond principle from his proof that the axiom of constructibility () implies the existence of a Suslin tree. Definitions The diamond principle says that there exists a , a family of sets for such that for any subset of ω1 the set of with is stationary in . There are several equivalent forms of the diamond principle. One states that there is a countable collection of subsets of for each countable ordinal such that for any subset of there is a stationary subset of such that for all in we have and . Another equivalent form states that there exist sets for such that for any subset of there is at least one infinite with . More generally, for a given cardinal number and a stationary set , the statement (some ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Constructible Universe
In mathematics, in set theory, the constructible universe (or Gödel's constructible universe), denoted by , is a particular class of sets that can be described entirely in terms of simpler sets. is the union of the constructible hierarchy . It was introduced by Kurt Gödel in his 1938 paper "The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalized Continuum-Hypothesis". In this paper, he proved that the constructible universe is an inner model of ZF set theory (that is, of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice excluded), and also that the axiom of choice and the generalized continuum hypothesis are true in the constructible universe. This shows that both propositions are consistent with the basic axioms of set theory, if ZF itself is consistent. Since many other theorems only hold in systems in which one or both of the propositions is true, their consistency is an important result. What is can be thought of as being built in "stages" resembling the constr ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
